Road Cycling · Public discussion

Re: biological pissport

Started by Donald Munro · · Last activity · 1 post · 468 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
21 January 2008
Last activity
21 January 2008
Original author
Donald Munro
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
468
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. MagillaGorilla said:
    Quoted message said:

    I already pointed out in a previous post that the biological pissport
    system won't matter for precisely that reason (because it's not in the
    WADA code). It simply doesn't matter if your numbers show any type of
    anomaly.

    This whole system is ill-conceived, meaningless, and a complete waste of
    money.


    Quoted message said:

    no one has any objections to now, but the first time there is a violation
    there will be a controversy about what is normal and what is an anomaly.

    They'll have an anomaly every time someone gets the runs
    like what happened to Schumacher before the WC.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.