General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: cardiac PET scan

Started by Andrew Kerr · · Last activity · 1 post · 262 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
11 August 2003
Last activity
11 August 2003
Original author
Andrew Kerr
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
262
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "John Wendel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    1) Up to what size in cm is heart attack considered large,moderate and
    small? 2)What's the smallest (in cm) heart attack that PET or SPECT can
    easily detect?3) Which test is better in diagnosing CAD: a resting only
    PET scan with FDG and rubidium or stress echo? Thanks

    1. I don't know, ask a cardiologist. I would think that percent of overall
    heart muscle would be more important than actual size.

    2. That question can't be answered. It will depend on the system resolution
    of the camera, the isotope used, the patients body habitus, and other
    factors.

    3. A rest only PET scan will not be much use in diagnosing CAD. The stress
    portion of the test is needed. Given those two choices, a stress echo is the
    better option.

    Andrew

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.