K
Kinky Cowboy
Guest
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 07:34:49 GMT, "Mike Jacoubowsky"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Polar, which generally makes decent units, is rapidly losing its position as
>market leader to Garmin. Once you play with the Edge 305, you'll have a
>tough time being happy with just about anything else. True, there's no
>optional power reading, but the optional power gadget for the Polar is
>expensive (about $350), difficult to set up correctly and not in the same
>league as units like the PowerTap.
>
I like the look of the Edge 305, but I have a couple if issues:
My Polar S720 is still working, so no excuse to upgrade!
I can see why Garmin keep the RS232 interface, for compatibility with
legacy devices, but they should add built in USB too, not charge 25%
of the price of the unit for a USB-Serial converter (that's a UK
complaint; US packages seem to include the cable, although it
obviously just pushes the package price up). For me, IRDA would be
even better as I have it built in to my laptop (I chose my laptop to
go with my Polar, not the other way around), and for everybody else
WiFi would be better still; you could download your data without even
taking the unit off the bike.
Battery life looks short; you couldn't have a decent weekend's riding
without an intermediate charge.
As far as I can see, the 305 doesn't use GPS for altitude; one of the
annoyances with the Polar barometric altimeter is that it needs to be
corrected pretty much every day, and it could still have a substantial
error by he end of a day's riding. Having it autocalibrated via GPS
would be cool.
It really needs a power measuring function to be a complete package;
if they could combine Garmin's GPS expertise with a receiver for the
Powertap wireless hub, we'd really have something
I think I'll wait for the next generation
Kinky Cowboy*
*Batteries not included
May contain traces of nuts
Your milage may vary
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Polar, which generally makes decent units, is rapidly losing its position as
>market leader to Garmin. Once you play with the Edge 305, you'll have a
>tough time being happy with just about anything else. True, there's no
>optional power reading, but the optional power gadget for the Polar is
>expensive (about $350), difficult to set up correctly and not in the same
>league as units like the PowerTap.
>
I like the look of the Edge 305, but I have a couple if issues:
My Polar S720 is still working, so no excuse to upgrade!
I can see why Garmin keep the RS232 interface, for compatibility with
legacy devices, but they should add built in USB too, not charge 25%
of the price of the unit for a USB-Serial converter (that's a UK
complaint; US packages seem to include the cable, although it
obviously just pushes the package price up). For me, IRDA would be
even better as I have it built in to my laptop (I chose my laptop to
go with my Polar, not the other way around), and for everybody else
WiFi would be better still; you could download your data without even
taking the unit off the bike.
Battery life looks short; you couldn't have a decent weekend's riding
without an intermediate charge.
As far as I can see, the 305 doesn't use GPS for altitude; one of the
annoyances with the Polar barometric altimeter is that it needs to be
corrected pretty much every day, and it could still have a substantial
error by he end of a day's riding. Having it autocalibrated via GPS
would be cool.
It really needs a power measuring function to be a complete package;
if they could combine Garmin's GPS expertise with a receiver for the
Powertap wireless hub, we'd really have something
I think I'll wait for the next generation
Kinky Cowboy*
*Batteries not included
May contain traces of nuts
Your milage may vary