M
Mike DeMicco
Guest
[email protected] wrote in newshtv011579ur4gcv7v2go1o8cc3m6mg25s@
4ax.com:
> On 13 Feb 2005 07:28:19 -0800, "Mike Yankee"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>ProLink is the best, in my opinion. I started using it on my fixed
>>gear and rain/beater road bikes 2-3 years ago. I use it on all my
>>bikes now.
>>
>>My only grip, and it's a small one, is that the last bottle I got had a
>>larger drip nozzle. The original one was an angled, almost pointy
>>nozzle with a small orifice. It worked splendidly; the new one
>>doesn't. But the stuff inside is what counts.
>
> Dear Mike,
>
> I'm not trying to start an argument, just curious--what
> makes ProLink better?
>
> Carl Fogel
I'll bite. The reason ProLink is better is that the chain doesn't get
that dirty (and as a result, the chain is easier to clean), and the lube
lasts quite a while (at least on road bikes). It seems to hold up to
water (at least better than those waxy lubes).
--
Mike DeMicco <[email protected]>
4ax.com:
> On 13 Feb 2005 07:28:19 -0800, "Mike Yankee"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>ProLink is the best, in my opinion. I started using it on my fixed
>>gear and rain/beater road bikes 2-3 years ago. I use it on all my
>>bikes now.
>>
>>My only grip, and it's a small one, is that the last bottle I got had a
>>larger drip nozzle. The original one was an angled, almost pointy
>>nozzle with a small orifice. It worked splendidly; the new one
>>doesn't. But the stuff inside is what counts.
>
> Dear Mike,
>
> I'm not trying to start an argument, just curious--what
> makes ProLink better?
>
> Carl Fogel
I'll bite. The reason ProLink is better is that the chain doesn't get
that dirty (and as a result, the chain is easier to clean), and the lube
lasts quite a while (at least on road bikes). It seems to hold up to
water (at least better than those waxy lubes).
--
Mike DeMicco <[email protected]>