B
yzfrr11 wrote:
> I just switched from T-9, just to try something new. I was very happy
> with T-9. I had minimal chain wear using it for 5000 miles.
>
> So far, Prolink seems good (2000 mi.)
>
> Anyone dislike Prolink?
>
>
> --
> yzfrr11
I noticed that Prolink is marketed as being "environmentally friendly."
Does anyone know what the basis of this is?
> I just switched from T-9, just to try something new. I was very happy
> with T-9. I had minimal chain wear using it for 5000 miles.
>
> So far, Prolink seems good (2000 mi.)
>
> Anyone dislike Prolink?
>
>
> --
> yzfrr11
I noticed that Prolink is marketed as being "environmentally friendly."
Does anyone know what the basis of this is?