P
Tom Kunich wrote:
>
> If the experiences in most of the world are anything to judge by,
risk
> compensation appears to only go one way. It isn't as if racers are
going to
> slow up now. That means they'll continue taking chances. Once out of
the
> bottle the genie can't be put back in.
That was a weak-ass response to my questions and you know it.
You may not intentionally be joining Ronde in the forces of troll, but
it's readily apparent you are incapable of putting further thought into
the topic at hand. (I'm new here but I've read the google archives)
You learned the term "risk compensation", felt warm/fuzzy/comfortable
with it, and are content to obstinately misuse the concept, to not
consider the bigger issues, and let your thinking stagnate.
You may get the last word, but give it to Ronde, as now you join him in
my killfile.
*PLONK*
>
> If the experiences in most of the world are anything to judge by,
risk
> compensation appears to only go one way. It isn't as if racers are
going to
> slow up now. That means they'll continue taking chances. Once out of
the
> bottle the genie can't be put back in.
That was a weak-ass response to my questions and you know it.
You may not intentionally be joining Ronde in the forces of troll, but
it's readily apparent you are incapable of putting further thought into
the topic at hand. (I'm new here but I've read the google archives)
You learned the term "risk compensation", felt warm/fuzzy/comfortable
with it, and are content to obstinately misuse the concept, to not
consider the bigger issues, and let your thinking stagnate.
You may get the last word, but give it to Ronde, as now you join him in
my killfile.
*PLONK*