M
Mark Probert
Guest
"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:1103844990.0d561ce0ae5b1a91963b26e207c39021@teranews...
> Mark Probert wrote:
> >
> > "James Stein" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "Mark Probert" <Mark [email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > >
> > > > "TC" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > >>
> > > >> Daniel Ganek wrote:
> > > >> > TC wrote:
> > > >> > > RobJ wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >>New York Times
> > > >> > >>December 23, 2004
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>F.D.A. Calls Ads for Cholesterol Pill Crestor 'False and
> > > >> Misleading'
> > > >> > >>By GARDINER HARRIS
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>WASHINGTON - AstraZeneca's recent full-page newspaper
> > > >> advertisements
> > > >> > >>defending the safety of its cholesterol-lowering pill, Crestor,
are
> > > >> > >>"false and misleading," in part because serious concerns remain
> > > >> about
> > > >> > >>the safety of the drug, federal drug regulators said Wednesday.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>The advertisements stated that "the F.D.A. has confidence in
the
> > > >> > >>safety and efficacy of Crestor" and that the agency "as
recently as
> > > >> > >>last Friday publicly confirmed that Crestor is safe and
effective."
> > > >> > >>Neither is true, said a letter from the Food and Drug
> > > >> Administration
> > > >> > >>to AstraZeneca.
> > > >> > [[ SNIP ]]
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Lookee, lookee, the FDA is actually trying to look as if it is
> > > >> doing
> > > >> > > something useful now. Too little too late, eh?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > TC
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I'm neither for nor against the FDA, BUT, wasn't it just a few
years
> > > >> > ago we were all *****ing that the FDA took TOO long to approve
drugs?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Now, we're all *****ing and moaning that they're not during their
job
> > > >> and
> > > >> > letting drugs on the market too soon!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > /dan
> > > >>
> > > >> Were we? I don't think so. Unless by "we" you are talking about the
> > > >> pharma industry.
> > > >
> > > > "We" were. "We" being people who were hearing about treatments in
the
> > > > development stages for conditions where there was no treatment or no
> > > > relief.
> > > > "We" demanded a shorter process.
> > >
> > > You should know by now: The ideal FDA needs to approve all effective
safe
> > > drugs overnight, and will catch all harmful and ineffective drugs
> > > immediately.
> > >
> > > And that little nonsense about a process for distinguishing between
the
> > two?
> > > The public's not concerned with that.
> >
> > Agreed. There are those who expect perfection from the FDA and all
> > humankind.
>
>
> Enter Christ Jesus
As a Jew, I find being proselytized offensive. Please do not respond to me
again in this manner.
news:1103844990.0d561ce0ae5b1a91963b26e207c39021@teranews...
> Mark Probert wrote:
> >
> > "James Stein" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "Mark Probert" <Mark [email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > >
> > > > "TC" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > >>
> > > >> Daniel Ganek wrote:
> > > >> > TC wrote:
> > > >> > > RobJ wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >>New York Times
> > > >> > >>December 23, 2004
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>F.D.A. Calls Ads for Cholesterol Pill Crestor 'False and
> > > >> Misleading'
> > > >> > >>By GARDINER HARRIS
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>WASHINGTON - AstraZeneca's recent full-page newspaper
> > > >> advertisements
> > > >> > >>defending the safety of its cholesterol-lowering pill, Crestor,
are
> > > >> > >>"false and misleading," in part because serious concerns remain
> > > >> about
> > > >> > >>the safety of the drug, federal drug regulators said Wednesday.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>The advertisements stated that "the F.D.A. has confidence in
the
> > > >> > >>safety and efficacy of Crestor" and that the agency "as
recently as
> > > >> > >>last Friday publicly confirmed that Crestor is safe and
effective."
> > > >> > >>Neither is true, said a letter from the Food and Drug
> > > >> Administration
> > > >> > >>to AstraZeneca.
> > > >> > [[ SNIP ]]
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Lookee, lookee, the FDA is actually trying to look as if it is
> > > >> doing
> > > >> > > something useful now. Too little too late, eh?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > TC
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I'm neither for nor against the FDA, BUT, wasn't it just a few
years
> > > >> > ago we were all *****ing that the FDA took TOO long to approve
drugs?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Now, we're all *****ing and moaning that they're not during their
job
> > > >> and
> > > >> > letting drugs on the market too soon!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > /dan
> > > >>
> > > >> Were we? I don't think so. Unless by "we" you are talking about the
> > > >> pharma industry.
> > > >
> > > > "We" were. "We" being people who were hearing about treatments in
the
> > > > development stages for conditions where there was no treatment or no
> > > > relief.
> > > > "We" demanded a shorter process.
> > >
> > > You should know by now: The ideal FDA needs to approve all effective
safe
> > > drugs overnight, and will catch all harmful and ineffective drugs
> > > immediately.
> > >
> > > And that little nonsense about a process for distinguishing between
the
> > two?
> > > The public's not concerned with that.
> >
> > Agreed. There are those who expect perfection from the FDA and all
> > humankind.
>
>
> Enter Christ Jesus
As a Jew, I find being proselytized offensive. Please do not respond to me
again in this manner.