General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: GPS - non-rechargeable versus rechargeable

Started by Chris Eilbeck · · Last activity · 2 posts · 351 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
18 January 2005
Last activity
21 January 2005
Original author
Chris Eilbeck
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
351
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted post said:

    Just as a test I've got a couple of AAA non-rechargeable batteries in
    my GPS and when compared to the life of rechargeable ones they appear
    to be lasting for absolutely ages....

    Any techies got an explanation?

    Yeah, primary cells ie non-rechargeable ones hold more charge than
    secondary, rechargeable ones. Nicads typically store 1/3-1/2 as much
    as an alkaline, nimh store 1/2-2/3 as much as alkaline. Lithium cells
    store is the best rechargeable technology but they still can't match
    alkalines. They also have the drawback that they're best with low
    current drains eg clocks, smoke alarms rather than high drains like
    gpses and torches.

    The discharge characteristics of batteries depends a lot on the load
    too. You should be able to download datasheets for your rechargeable
    cells and compare them to the alkaline datasheets you can download
    from http://www.duracell.com/oem

    Hope this helps

    Chris
    --
    Chris Eilbeck [email hidden]
    MARS Flight Crew http://www.mars.org.uk/
    UKRA #1108 Level 2 UYB
    Tripoli UK Member #9527 LSMR

  2. "Chris Eilbeck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted post said:

    Just as a test I've got a couple of AAA non-rechargeable batteries in
    my GPS and when compared to the life of rechargeable ones they appear
    to be lasting for absolutely ages....

    Any techies got an explanation?

    Yeah, primary cells ie non-rechargeable ones hold more charge than
    secondary, rechargeable ones. Nicads typically store 1/3-1/2 as much
    as an alkaline, nimh store 1/2-2/3 as much as alkaline. Lithium cells
    store is the best rechargeable technology but they still can't match
    alkalines. They also have the drawback that they're best with low
    current drains eg clocks, smoke alarms rather than high drains like
    gpses and torches.


    Mike Brock adds:

    I've had four Duracell Pile Alkaline AA rechargeable batteries since I
    bought my digi camera (Sony Cybershot 3.2) 3 years ago. I must have taken
    over 20,000 pictures using the 4 batteries (alternated and recharged) and
    they are still going strong. I'm very impressed as I'm sure I'd have gone
    through loads of non-rechargeables on the use they have had. Not tried them
    in my GPS as I stick to conventional non-rechargeables (Garmin Etrex
    Summit). Would they work in the GPS as well as they do in the Camera?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.