A difference of opinion, but saying something is a "waste" is certainly not
neutral on the issue.
Even with a coach, the athlete still has to do the work. I have coached
runners for a while now and created training plans that should work but if
the athlete does not do the workouts, he/she will not see results. The
information on forums and books are fine in some cases, but also not
specific enough for an individual and too random. A snip it here a snip it
there.
I firmly believe that most people will improve with a coach since I believe
most people train in a very haphazard method. I feel good today, I'll go
long or hard.
Drugs are completely different issue.
"IMKen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:True, it's just that i get satisfaction from racing my own race and not
someone else's. Finding my limits is half the fun. I believe that to be
a
Quoted message said:serious competitor you need to know your limits. When you are standing on
the podium you know that you did your best and not the best of some coach.
Considerable information is available in these forums and elsewhere for
those starting out. I'm not telling anyone not to get a coach, just
saying
Quoted message said:that I think it is sort of a waste, sort of like taking performance
enhancing drugs by not doing the work yourself, :-).Ken
"Sam" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:A coach is for anyone who wants to improve. Some people do not want to
takeQuoted message said:the time necessary to figure out what they should be doing in training
and
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:hiring a coach can simplify this process. A coach can speed the
learning
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:curve and provide objective feedback. Coaches are not just for pros or
ageQuoted message said:group winners.
"IMKen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:I don't agree with Sam on the coach. I do agree that you should not
lockQuoted message said:Quoted message said:yourself into the figures from a book. Training at 50 to 60% is
pretty
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:much a waste of time. Sam and I agree on that. It might be suitable
forQuoted message said:a
Quoted message said:recovering invalid but not a serious triathlete.
Stick to work-outs above 70% for the easy days and hit the high
numbers
Quoted message said:on
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:your short intense days . Coaches are for Pros and possibly those
wantingQuoted message said:Quoted message said:to be age group winners. Go have fun with a group and experiment.
It'sQuoted message said:Quoted message said:fun and satisfying to do what is inside you. Train to a book and you
areQuoted message said:Quoted message said:just a reprint.
Ken
"Garett Bugda" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Hello
> I am a fairly new triathlete. I did one last season and looking to
do
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:three
> this season.
>
> I am trying to figure out how to maximize my heart rate readings. I
wouldQuoted message said:> love some help here.
>
> For example. I was following Eric Haar's book and it says to run for
30Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> minutes at a HR of 50-60%
> I am 33 years old. So this should be about 92-114 or so. But as
soon
Quoted message said:as
Quoted message said:I
Quoted message said:> start running at a comfortable
> pace..I am already up in the 130-140 range. 160 if I am running at a
strong
> pace.
>
> I am trying to make the most of my training,but need some help
understanding
> my readings.
>
> Also trying to figure out where to keep my HR to get the most during
theQuoted message said:Quoted message said:> event.
>
> thanks for help.
> Garett
>
>