C
On 30 May 2006 19:18:37 -0700, "Ed Pirrero" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>[email protected] wrote:
>> On 30 May 2006 18:29:01 -0700, "Ed Pirrero" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >[email protected] wrote:
>> >> Dear Ed,
>> >>
>> >> So why did you stop the name-calling when it was pointed out?
>> >>
>> >
>> >Again, Carl, you seem to miss the hilarious irony of you pointing out
>> >the flaws in anyone else's manners. And did I name-call other than
>> >that one time?
>> >
>> >Maybe I started and stopped in one whole post, and the "pointing out"
>> >had nothing to do with anything?
>> >
>> >Tend to your own manners, Carl. They need much more work than mine.
>> >At least from what I've read here...
>> >
>> >E.P.
>>
>> Dear Ed,
>>
>> You wrote:
>>
>> "Hey, I'm curious - are you always such an asshole, or just one on the
>> internet?"
>
>And used that kind of terminology again, where? As in stopping
>*before* it was pointed out?
>
>Back up your claim, Carl.
>
>Oh, and remind us again how only name-calling is poor manners?
>
>> Please give us an example of my manners, the ones that you feel need
>> tending, that's equally clear and recent.
>
>A recent open letter to you in this newsgroup made it clear that you
>are not the paragon of good manners.
>
>But your participation in this portion of the thread proves that,
>right?
>
>E.P.
Dear Ed,
Do you mean the "open letter" whose author first wrote to me saying
this, before his bizarre switch to a public blackmail attempt?
>Hi Carl,
>
>It was always obvious that X "marched to his own drummer", but I
>just naively assumed it was his way of having fun. Now, it is apparent
>something very different is afoot. How sad. Seriously disturbed people
>have miserable lives and more often than not, inflict that misery on
>those around them.
>
>Thanks for the head's up.
>
>Richard
He never explained what changed his mind, apart from weird nonsense
about "betraying confidences" that he never made to people who exist
only in his imagination.
Please point to where my participation in this portion of the thread
proves whatever you think it does. Be explicit. Surely if my manners
are so offensive, it must be easy to find something to back up your
repeated claims.
Incidentally, did your parents ever mention simply apologizing to
people when you call them ugly and unjustified names in public?
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
wrote:
>
>[email protected] wrote:
>> On 30 May 2006 18:29:01 -0700, "Ed Pirrero" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >[email protected] wrote:
>> >> Dear Ed,
>> >>
>> >> So why did you stop the name-calling when it was pointed out?
>> >>
>> >
>> >Again, Carl, you seem to miss the hilarious irony of you pointing out
>> >the flaws in anyone else's manners. And did I name-call other than
>> >that one time?
>> >
>> >Maybe I started and stopped in one whole post, and the "pointing out"
>> >had nothing to do with anything?
>> >
>> >Tend to your own manners, Carl. They need much more work than mine.
>> >At least from what I've read here...
>> >
>> >E.P.
>>
>> Dear Ed,
>>
>> You wrote:
>>
>> "Hey, I'm curious - are you always such an asshole, or just one on the
>> internet?"
>
>And used that kind of terminology again, where? As in stopping
>*before* it was pointed out?
>
>Back up your claim, Carl.
>
>Oh, and remind us again how only name-calling is poor manners?
>
>> Please give us an example of my manners, the ones that you feel need
>> tending, that's equally clear and recent.
>
>A recent open letter to you in this newsgroup made it clear that you
>are not the paragon of good manners.
>
>But your participation in this portion of the thread proves that,
>right?
>
>E.P.
Dear Ed,
Do you mean the "open letter" whose author first wrote to me saying
this, before his bizarre switch to a public blackmail attempt?
>Hi Carl,
>
>It was always obvious that X "marched to his own drummer", but I
>just naively assumed it was his way of having fun. Now, it is apparent
>something very different is afoot. How sad. Seriously disturbed people
>have miserable lives and more often than not, inflict that misery on
>those around them.
>
>Thanks for the head's up.
>
>Richard
He never explained what changed his mind, apart from weird nonsense
about "betraying confidences" that he never made to people who exist
only in his imagination.
Please point to where my participation in this portion of the thread
proves whatever you think it does. Be explicit. Surely if my manners
are so offensive, it must be easy to find something to back up your
repeated claims.
Incidentally, did your parents ever mention simply apologizing to
people when you call them ugly and unjustified names in public?
Cheers,
Carl Fogel