Re: "It's okay to kill someone, as long as we find a good reason for it afterward"

[jazu]

I think we have enough reasons to kill you

"Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> This is the logic used to justify the killing of mountain lions SUSPECTED
of
> attacking a human. Maybe that's where George Bush learned how to
rationalize
> attacking Iraq. First he said there were "weapons of mass destruction"
there,
> but when he didn't find any, he changed his tune to "removing a brutal
> dictator".
>
> If it's so important to make sure, AFTER THE FACT, that the right mountain
lion
> was killed, I wonder why it isn't important BEFORE killing it?
>
> In any case, the fact that mountain lions are attacking humans only proves
that
> we don't belong there. Mountain bikes, at a minimum, should be banned in
> mountain lion habitat (because they greatly extend the range of human
access).
> Where possible, ALL human access should be banned.
> ===
> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
> humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
>
> http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

 

[Birdman42]

"jazu" <1> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> I think we have enough reasons to kill you
That freedom of speech thing really bothers you, doesn't it?



>
> "Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > This is the logic used to justify the killing of mountain lions
SUSPECTED
> of
> > attacking a human. Maybe that's where George Bush learned how to
> rationalize
> > attacking Iraq. First he said there were "weapons of mass destruction"
> there,
> > but when he didn't find any, he changed his tune to "removing a brutal
> > dictator".
> >
> > If it's so important to make sure, AFTER THE FACT, that the right
mountain
> lion
> > was killed, I wonder why it isn't important BEFORE killing it?
> >
> > In any case, the fact that mountain lions are attacking humans only
proves
> that
> > we don't belong there. Mountain bikes, at a minimum, should be banned in
> > mountain lion habitat (because they greatly extend the range of human
> access).
> > Where possible, ALL human access should be banned.
> > ===
> > I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
> > humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
> > years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
> >
> > http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
>
>