Dogfighting said:http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/more/08/05/landis.positive.ap/index.html
Proof positive
Landis' backup sample confirms 'adverse' finding
Why post a link and the entire article? The link is sufficient, no?
R
Road Cycling · Public discussion
Re: Landis' backup sample confirms 'adverse' finding
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 5 August 2006
- Last activity
- 5 August 2006
- Original author
- RicodJour
- Posts
- 3
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 338
- Views / 30 days
- 6
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
"RicodJour" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Dogfighting said:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/more/08/05/landis.positive.ap/index.html
Proof positive
Landis' backup sample confirms 'adverse' findingWhy post a link and the entire article? The link is sufficient, no?
What if the original piece is taken down from their website?
-
Carl Sundquist said:
"RicodJour" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted message said:
Dogfighting said:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/more/08/05/landis.positive.ap/index.html
Proof positive
Landis' backup sample confirms 'adverse' findingWhy post a link and the entire article? The link is sufficient, no?
What if the original piece is taken down from their website?
You mean that I can maintain hope that one day this topic won't be
polluting our channels, it'll just disappear? Thanks for the pick me
up!R
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.