D
Dave Larrington
Guest
LSMike wrote:
> Thanks, that's interesting. I always wondered if I was being an
> illegal pavement cyclist entering my home by cycling a short way
> (50m) from the nearest dropped curb. There is a pathway from the
> entrance to the road, but it is narrow with protective bollards,
> there is no dropped curb, and it is on a busy road.
Yes, you are a terrorist. Here comes Mr. Clarke now
Actually I do something similar, as Larrington Towers is located on a
junction, the "front" gate is in the side road and it's a one-way street.
To be legal I should have to cycle round three sides of a sizeable
rectangle; alternatively I can do three yards on the footway. No-one has
complained yet...
--
Dave Larrington - <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/>
The best way to confuse a Daily Mail reader is to tell it that
paedophiles form the staple diet of asylum seekers.
> Thanks, that's interesting. I always wondered if I was being an
> illegal pavement cyclist entering my home by cycling a short way
> (50m) from the nearest dropped curb. There is a pathway from the
> entrance to the road, but it is narrow with protective bollards,
> there is no dropped curb, and it is on a busy road.
Yes, you are a terrorist. Here comes Mr. Clarke now
Actually I do something similar, as Larrington Towers is located on a
junction, the "front" gate is in the side road and it's a one-way street.
To be legal I should have to cycle round three sides of a sizeable
rectangle; alternatively I can do three yards on the footway. No-one has
complained yet...
--
Dave Larrington - <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/>
The best way to confuse a Daily Mail reader is to tell it that
paedophiles form the staple diet of asylum seekers.