J
Jan
Guest
>Subject: Re: Massive Multinational Assault on Alternative Medicines
>From: Peter Bowditch [email protected]
>Date: 7/17/2003 7:06 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>
>[email protected] (Jan) wrote:
>
>>>Subject: Re: Massive Multinational Assault on Alternative Medicines
>>>From: Peter Bowditch [email protected]
>>>Date: 7/17/2003 4:38 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>[email protected] (Jan) wrote:
>>>
>>>>Good question, and how did the supplements become inferieor, but not one
>>>single
>>>>prescription medicine was recalled, yet they were manufactured by the same
>>>>company??
>>>
>>>The prescription drug Allegron was recalled. This means that the
>>>statement "not one single prescription medicine was recalled" is
>>>incorrect. The fact that Joe Vialls said this is just an example of
>>>his unfamiliarity with truth or reason.
>>>
>>>http://www.health.gov.au/tga/docs/html/mediarel/mrpan6.htm
>>>
>>>As you now know that at least one prescription drug was recalled (the
>>>only one made by Pan, it seems), any further repetition of the "not
>>>one single ..." claim will be an acknowledgement of the fact that you
>>>share Vialls' view of the truth. Put another way, saying it is lying,
>>>now that you know it is not true.
>>
>>Whoopie!!
>>
>>A whole 178 packs of 50 tablets each.
>>
>>Jan
>>
>
>I ask people to note that Jan's response to being shown that something
>she was saying was wrong was to reply "Whoopie!!" and then imply that
>it was only a little bit wrong. I predict that the lie will be
>repeated within a week.
Mercy, I though Rich was the only one allowed to do the predictions.
>178 packets were recalled because 178 packets were made. Recalling any
>less would have been irresponsible. Recalling any more would have been
>impossible.
Well, I knew you would have a complete ratiional answer.
And what about all the other prescription drugs?? The violations just happened
to miss them. The supplements were recallled by the groves, but only 178 pks of
drug, amazing!
Jan
>From: Peter Bowditch [email protected]
>Date: 7/17/2003 7:06 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>
>[email protected] (Jan) wrote:
>
>>>Subject: Re: Massive Multinational Assault on Alternative Medicines
>>>From: Peter Bowditch [email protected]
>>>Date: 7/17/2003 4:38 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>[email protected] (Jan) wrote:
>>>
>>>>Good question, and how did the supplements become inferieor, but not one
>>>single
>>>>prescription medicine was recalled, yet they were manufactured by the same
>>>>company??
>>>
>>>The prescription drug Allegron was recalled. This means that the
>>>statement "not one single prescription medicine was recalled" is
>>>incorrect. The fact that Joe Vialls said this is just an example of
>>>his unfamiliarity with truth or reason.
>>>
>>>http://www.health.gov.au/tga/docs/html/mediarel/mrpan6.htm
>>>
>>>As you now know that at least one prescription drug was recalled (the
>>>only one made by Pan, it seems), any further repetition of the "not
>>>one single ..." claim will be an acknowledgement of the fact that you
>>>share Vialls' view of the truth. Put another way, saying it is lying,
>>>now that you know it is not true.
>>
>>Whoopie!!
>>
>>A whole 178 packs of 50 tablets each.
>>
>>Jan
>>
>
>I ask people to note that Jan's response to being shown that something
>she was saying was wrong was to reply "Whoopie!!" and then imply that
>it was only a little bit wrong. I predict that the lie will be
>repeated within a week.
Mercy, I though Rich was the only one allowed to do the predictions.
>178 packets were recalled because 178 packets were made. Recalling any
>less would have been irresponsible. Recalling any more would have been
>impossible.
Well, I knew you would have a complete ratiional answer.
And what about all the other prescription drugs?? The violations just happened
to miss them. The supplements were recallled by the groves, but only 178 pks of
drug, amazing!
Jan