"Mike Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:In article <[email hidden]>, David W
Quoted message said:<[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:On 28 Mar,
[email hidden] wrote:> Chek out the 200 Fly WR today. He's 1 1/2 body lengths AHEAD of the WR
> line. To give some perspective on Phelps 200 fly performance today. no
> one
> has broken the 200 fly WR by that much since 1959.I just wonder what he's on to enhance perfomance.
Rare genes, the right training and dedication to the task would be my guess.
Something that won't be detectable for about a decade. Too much money
BEHIND the doping, and not enough AHEAD of the doping. Think it all
went over the edge with corporate sponsors...Hate to say it (don't mean to be a troll) but I don't think there's one
clean swimmer in the finals from ANY country, male or female.
Seriously...
Why?
If drugs were rife in swimming we'd hear more about it. It can't be so common
yet hardly a word ever seeps out. The swimmers themselves would know it was
going on and some would speak out. This has happened in track and field, but it
hasn't happened in swimming to my knowledge. It's been a problem in the past of
course, mostly with East German and Chinese women, but I am confident that the
anti-drug culture of swimming in the US and Australia - the countries that win
most events - is working and that doping is rare in those countries.
David