S
Steven M. Scharf
Guest
R15757 wrote:
>Cycling is probably not appreciably more dangerous
>than walking or driving in traffic, but it's good
>entertainment when folks try to prove with
>accident statistics that cycling is "not dangerous."
>But if Frank has some real numbers I'd love
>to see them.
I'm sure that he'd be happy to make some up for you. Of course there are
no such statistics, but that's a minor problem. Are you talking about
danger per mile, danger per hour, danger per capita, or what? Do you
want data for the U.S., China, New Zealand, or the moon.
>Cycling is probably not appreciably more dangerous
>than walking or driving in traffic, but it's good
>entertainment when folks try to prove with
>accident statistics that cycling is "not dangerous."
>But if Frank has some real numbers I'd love
>to see them.
I'm sure that he'd be happy to make some up for you. Of course there are
no such statistics, but that's a minor problem. Are you talking about
danger per mile, danger per hour, danger per capita, or what? Do you
want data for the U.S., China, New Zealand, or the moon.