R
R15757
Guest
Frank K. wrote:
> ...
> I suspect that if you could find the sort of matched pair data you're
>considering, you'd find the data had such wide scatter that nothing
>could be learned. ...
The same is true of the per-hour injury
and fatality numbers, yet it doesn't stop
you from using them.
>I'm even more doubtful that it could be done while maintaining enough
>scientific skepticism to actually examine the results in an impartial
>manner.
"Scientific skepticism" seems to be something
Frank can turn on and off when it suits him.
Robert
> ...
> I suspect that if you could find the sort of matched pair data you're
>considering, you'd find the data had such wide scatter that nothing
>could be learned. ...
The same is true of the per-hour injury
and fatality numbers, yet it doesn't stop
you from using them.
>I'm even more doubtful that it could be done while maintaining enough
>scientific skepticism to actually examine the results in an impartial
>manner.
"Scientific skepticism" seems to be something
Frank can turn on and off when it suits him.
Robert