K
Pop wrote:
> You don't "debate" anything and you know it. You tease, urge,
> and implore for anything you can twist, lie about, and
> misconstrue until you can bring out your prejudices and, of late,
> your fetishes, until you figure you can feed on the hate and
> discontent you create, and then sit back and feel warm fuzzies
> about reading your own one-handed typings.
You are of course lying. Please provide some examples.
> I ONLY WANT ONE THING FROM KANERS: GET THE HELL OF THE FOSTER
> CARE SUPPORT GROUP AND GIVE IT BACK TO THOSE FOR WHOM IT WAS
> ORIGINALLY CREATED. IT IS NOT YOUR OWN PERSONAL PLAYGROUND FOR
> YOUR WEIRDNESS AND INCOMPETENT OPINES OF LIES AND MISINFORMATION.
It is an unregulated open forum that is deliberately so to frustrate
and limit those such as you that are caught up in your own little power
struggles with reality.
> FROM THIS POINT FORWARD ALL I HAVE TO SAY IN THIS THREAD IS TO GO
> AWAY, MAD OR NOT, I DON'T CARE.
Odd, considering your claim above, that you then went on to say:
> JUST GO AWAY AND BECOME HUMAN IF
> YOU STILL CAN.
Didn't you just say you that "FROM THIS POINT FORWARD ALL I HAVE TO SAY
IN THIS THREAD IS TO GO AWAY, MAD OR NOT, I DON'T CARE."?
Apparently you can't keep your word even to yourself.
> YOU WON'T THOUGH. YOU'LL CONTINUE YOUR SILLINESS
> AND CONTRARINESS TO YOUR GRAVE
Well, there is that old First Amendment thingie, and this lovely
unregulated forum. 0:->
> WHEREAFTER YOU WON'T BE MEETING
> THE PEEPS
You call people, "PEEPS?"
> YOUR RELIGION SUGGESTS.
My "religion?" I'm an athiest. I have no religion.
I won't be 'meeting' anyone after I'm dead, Poopinpants.
And those such as you make it extra sweet that I won't have to be
concerned I might run into your kind.
> HAVE YOU HAD ANY STRANGERS AT
> YOUR DOOR LATELY?
Sure. And you?
0:->
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> :
> : Pop wrote:
> : > JUST WHAT I EXPECTED: A KANER GRABBED IT AND WANTS TO ARGUE
> ABOUT
> : > IT. NO COMMENTS ON THE POST SUBJECT, JUST AN INVITATION TO
> ARGUE
> : > SO IT CAN WORK UP TO DISPLAYING ITS FETISHES SOME MORE.
> :
> : Not once in all the times I've invited you to debate have you
> done so,
> : but rather fell immediately into this very same kind of rant.
> :
> : What would you think you said that would suggest you were ready
> to
> : debate and or discuss this new information any more now than in
> the
> : past when you refused?
> :
> : > IT
> : > CONTINUES TO THINK IT CAN TAUNT AND ASKS QUESTIONS IT ALREADY
> : > KNOWS THE ANSWERS TO; SMART, AIN'T IT?
> :
> : I do not know the answers to the following questions I asked:
> :
> : (by the way, notice that you did NOT offer in your reply to me
> to
> : discuss the information Ron posted.....0:->...apparently you'd
> rather
> : fight and insinuate and make claims you can't support with
> proof.)
> :
> : 1. How does the information in the article support foster
> parents?
> :
> : 2. Have you had a change of heart?
> :
> : 3. Or have you simply decided to target certain individuals to
> insult
> : and lie about (attack)?
> :
> : 4. And I really don't know if you are prepared to grow up or
> : not....until I read this reply of yours. The answer NOW is
> obvious.
> : Before I had to guess.
> :
> : So much for your claims about my intent and preknowledge of
> question's
> : answers.
> :
> : I invite you once again, to actually discuss issues.
> :
> : Just as I did in this my post before this.....have you decided
> yet to
> : widen, to the normal and reasonable, what is support to foster
> parents,
> : or are you simply going to attack the poster?
> :
> : Your ONE reasonable response, in this case to Ron, encourages
> me to ask
> : these questions. Your response to me tends to make me think you
> are NOT
> : going to continue with reasonable responses and debate.
> :
> : It seems you do NOT like hard questions, little man.
> :
> : In fact you don't like easy ones either. Was there something in
> : particular in Ron's posted info you'd like to discuss with me?
> I'm
> : open. And I asked you to tell us how it supports foster
> parents.
> :
> : 0:->
> :
> :
> :
> : >
> : >
> : > <[email protected]> wrote in message
> : > news:[email protected]...
> : > : So, how does this support foster parents and how is it when
> : > other
> : > : articles have been cited you have gone off on one of your
> : > tirading
> : > : rants?
> : > :
> : > : Having a little change of heart, or have you decided that
> you
> : > will
> : > : target only certain people?
> : > :
> : > : Yer a nutcase, Pop.
> : > :
> : > : A recommendation from YOU would make me think twice about
> the
> : > value of
> : > : an article, though this one doesn't really SUPPORT foster
> : > parents. For
> : > : what it is though, a warning to people THINKING about
> becomign
> : > FOSTER
> : > : PARENTS, it's pretty darn good.
> : > :
> : > : How about you tone it down and let other people choose how
> to
> : > "SUPPORT"
> : > : foster parents with similar flexibility that YOU seem to
> think
> : > YOU but
> : > : no one else has?
> : > :
> : > : All information about child protection, or child abuse and
> : > abuses, no
> : > : matter who the perp, if that child is coming into or likely
> to
> : > come
> : > : into contact with CPS is in fact information that foster
> : > parents and
> : > : 0:-> those that are considering becoming foster parents can
> and
> : > usually
> : > : do find useful and supportive. That you personally do not
> find
> : > a
> : > : particular piece of information of interest to YOU does not
> : > mean that
> : > : it isn't to others who foster.
> : > :
> : > : So, grow up, little man.
> : > :
> : > : 0:->
> : > :
> : > :
> : > : Pop wrote:
> : > : > "Ron" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> : > : > news:92INe.770$UI.7@okepread05...
> : > : > :A rather interesting article for prospective foster
> parents.
> : > : > : Read it before committing to something that WILL change
> : > your
> : > : > life.
> : > : > :
> : > : > : http://nncf.unl.edu/foster/sharing/Swobodaarticle.html
> : > : > :
> : > : > : Ron
> : > : > :
> : > : > :
> : > : >
> : > : > Hmm, that's a pretty good article. The site's new to me,
> but
> : > : > I've read some of Swoboda before - decent stuff. I liked
> the
> : > : > frank and candid nature of the information and how it's
> : > : > presented.
> : > : >
> : > : > Pop
> : > :
> :
> You don't "debate" anything and you know it. You tease, urge,
> and implore for anything you can twist, lie about, and
> misconstrue until you can bring out your prejudices and, of late,
> your fetishes, until you figure you can feed on the hate and
> discontent you create, and then sit back and feel warm fuzzies
> about reading your own one-handed typings.
You are of course lying. Please provide some examples.
> I ONLY WANT ONE THING FROM KANERS: GET THE HELL OF THE FOSTER
> CARE SUPPORT GROUP AND GIVE IT BACK TO THOSE FOR WHOM IT WAS
> ORIGINALLY CREATED. IT IS NOT YOUR OWN PERSONAL PLAYGROUND FOR
> YOUR WEIRDNESS AND INCOMPETENT OPINES OF LIES AND MISINFORMATION.
It is an unregulated open forum that is deliberately so to frustrate
and limit those such as you that are caught up in your own little power
struggles with reality.
> FROM THIS POINT FORWARD ALL I HAVE TO SAY IN THIS THREAD IS TO GO
> AWAY, MAD OR NOT, I DON'T CARE.
Odd, considering your claim above, that you then went on to say:
> JUST GO AWAY AND BECOME HUMAN IF
> YOU STILL CAN.
Didn't you just say you that "FROM THIS POINT FORWARD ALL I HAVE TO SAY
IN THIS THREAD IS TO GO AWAY, MAD OR NOT, I DON'T CARE."?
Apparently you can't keep your word even to yourself.
> YOU WON'T THOUGH. YOU'LL CONTINUE YOUR SILLINESS
> AND CONTRARINESS TO YOUR GRAVE
Well, there is that old First Amendment thingie, and this lovely
unregulated forum. 0:->
> WHEREAFTER YOU WON'T BE MEETING
> THE PEEPS
You call people, "PEEPS?"
> YOUR RELIGION SUGGESTS.
My "religion?" I'm an athiest. I have no religion.
I won't be 'meeting' anyone after I'm dead, Poopinpants.
And those such as you make it extra sweet that I won't have to be
concerned I might run into your kind.
> HAVE YOU HAD ANY STRANGERS AT
> YOUR DOOR LATELY?
Sure. And you?
0:->
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> :
> : Pop wrote:
> : > JUST WHAT I EXPECTED: A KANER GRABBED IT AND WANTS TO ARGUE
> ABOUT
> : > IT. NO COMMENTS ON THE POST SUBJECT, JUST AN INVITATION TO
> ARGUE
> : > SO IT CAN WORK UP TO DISPLAYING ITS FETISHES SOME MORE.
> :
> : Not once in all the times I've invited you to debate have you
> done so,
> : but rather fell immediately into this very same kind of rant.
> :
> : What would you think you said that would suggest you were ready
> to
> : debate and or discuss this new information any more now than in
> the
> : past when you refused?
> :
> : > IT
> : > CONTINUES TO THINK IT CAN TAUNT AND ASKS QUESTIONS IT ALREADY
> : > KNOWS THE ANSWERS TO; SMART, AIN'T IT?
> :
> : I do not know the answers to the following questions I asked:
> :
> : (by the way, notice that you did NOT offer in your reply to me
> to
> : discuss the information Ron posted.....0:->...apparently you'd
> rather
> : fight and insinuate and make claims you can't support with
> proof.)
> :
> : 1. How does the information in the article support foster
> parents?
> :
> : 2. Have you had a change of heart?
> :
> : 3. Or have you simply decided to target certain individuals to
> insult
> : and lie about (attack)?
> :
> : 4. And I really don't know if you are prepared to grow up or
> : not....until I read this reply of yours. The answer NOW is
> obvious.
> : Before I had to guess.
> :
> : So much for your claims about my intent and preknowledge of
> question's
> : answers.
> :
> : I invite you once again, to actually discuss issues.
> :
> : Just as I did in this my post before this.....have you decided
> yet to
> : widen, to the normal and reasonable, what is support to foster
> parents,
> : or are you simply going to attack the poster?
> :
> : Your ONE reasonable response, in this case to Ron, encourages
> me to ask
> : these questions. Your response to me tends to make me think you
> are NOT
> : going to continue with reasonable responses and debate.
> :
> : It seems you do NOT like hard questions, little man.
> :
> : In fact you don't like easy ones either. Was there something in
> : particular in Ron's posted info you'd like to discuss with me?
> I'm
> : open. And I asked you to tell us how it supports foster
> parents.
> :
> : 0:->
> :
> :
> :
> : >
> : >
> : > <[email protected]> wrote in message
> : > news:[email protected]...
> : > : So, how does this support foster parents and how is it when
> : > other
> : > : articles have been cited you have gone off on one of your
> : > tirading
> : > : rants?
> : > :
> : > : Having a little change of heart, or have you decided that
> you
> : > will
> : > : target only certain people?
> : > :
> : > : Yer a nutcase, Pop.
> : > :
> : > : A recommendation from YOU would make me think twice about
> the
> : > value of
> : > : an article, though this one doesn't really SUPPORT foster
> : > parents. For
> : > : what it is though, a warning to people THINKING about
> becomign
> : > FOSTER
> : > : PARENTS, it's pretty darn good.
> : > :
> : > : How about you tone it down and let other people choose how
> to
> : > "SUPPORT"
> : > : foster parents with similar flexibility that YOU seem to
> think
> : > YOU but
> : > : no one else has?
> : > :
> : > : All information about child protection, or child abuse and
> : > abuses, no
> : > : matter who the perp, if that child is coming into or likely
> to
> : > come
> : > : into contact with CPS is in fact information that foster
> : > parents and
> : > : 0:-> those that are considering becoming foster parents can
> and
> : > usually
> : > : do find useful and supportive. That you personally do not
> find
> : > a
> : > : particular piece of information of interest to YOU does not
> : > mean that
> : > : it isn't to others who foster.
> : > :
> : > : So, grow up, little man.
> : > :
> : > : 0:->
> : > :
> : > :
> : > : Pop wrote:
> : > : > "Ron" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> : > : > news:92INe.770$UI.7@okepread05...
> : > : > :A rather interesting article for prospective foster
> parents.
> : > : > : Read it before committing to something that WILL change
> : > your
> : > : > life.
> : > : > :
> : > : > : http://nncf.unl.edu/foster/sharing/Swobodaarticle.html
> : > : > :
> : > : > : Ron
> : > : > :
> : > : > :
> : > : >
> : > : > Hmm, that's a pretty good article. The site's new to me,
> but
> : > : > I've read some of Swoboda before - decent stuff. I liked
> the
> : > : > frank and candid nature of the information and how it's
> : > : > presented.
> : > : >
> : > : > Pop
> : > :
> :
