M
Marian
Guest
On May 3, 9:03 am, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> Well, what use is a Pro Tour if a large percentage of those competing aren't
> at a majority of the races? And if the UCI puts these races all around the
> world you can bet that will happen. Say for instance that American racers
> race the American Pro Tour race. They probably aren't going to go to China
> to race one there. And in all likelihood neither will they go off to Europe.
> It will be a local race to most people and the entire idea of a Pro Tour
> then loses most of its impact.
I'd be willing to bet that a 2.2 race in China provides better in
terms of travel expenses and accomodation than an equally ranked race
in the US would for a similarly ranked team.
And I seem to recall that what the TdQL doesn't provide in terms of
accomodation (it really is that bad and even worse for the event
staff) they make up for with appearance fees, as well as the nifty
factor from racing at 3000m above sea level on the Tibetan plateau.
-M
> Well, what use is a Pro Tour if a large percentage of those competing aren't
> at a majority of the races? And if the UCI puts these races all around the
> world you can bet that will happen. Say for instance that American racers
> race the American Pro Tour race. They probably aren't going to go to China
> to race one there. And in all likelihood neither will they go off to Europe.
> It will be a local race to most people and the entire idea of a Pro Tour
> then loses most of its impact.
I'd be willing to bet that a 2.2 race in China provides better in
terms of travel expenses and accomodation than an equally ranked race
in the US would for a similarly ranked team.
And I seem to recall that what the TdQL doesn't provide in terms of
accomodation (it really is that bad and even worse for the event
staff) they make up for with appearance fees, as well as the nifty
factor from racing at 3000m above sea level on the Tibetan plateau.
-M
