T
Tom Kunich
Guest
"Bill Z." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Tom Kunich" <[email protected]> writes:
>> And yet the most extreme design without vents wasn't as aerodynamic as a
>> bald head. Explain how your helmet with vents can be more aerodynamic
>> than a
>> V1 Pro.
>
> A V1 Pro has vents. Mine does too, plus having a more aerodyanmic
> shape. Is that *really* so hard for you to understand? And a bald
> head is not relevant when you are not going to shave your head in
> any case.
1) You haven't a clue what "more aerodynamic" means unless your helmet was
tested in a wind tunnel. Aerodymanics of low speed laminar flow shapes
cannot be estimated unless you have hundreds of hours in wind tunnel
research.
I have 10's of hours. What about you?
>> Oh, that's right - your proof of that proved just the opposite.
>
> Nope, and repeating yourself won't make it so.
In case you've missed it, short hair is in. Short hair has a great deal less
aerodynamic drag than a modern helmet. Modern helmets don't meet the Snell
Foundation crash standards and perhaps HALF of them do not meet the
'voluntary' ANSI standards because they are self-certified.
The fact of the matter is that wearing a helmet makes little if any sense
but then you'll defend helmets to the death. Hopefully at the hands of a
defective helmet.
news:[email protected]...
> "Tom Kunich" <[email protected]> writes:
>> And yet the most extreme design without vents wasn't as aerodynamic as a
>> bald head. Explain how your helmet with vents can be more aerodynamic
>> than a
>> V1 Pro.
>
> A V1 Pro has vents. Mine does too, plus having a more aerodyanmic
> shape. Is that *really* so hard for you to understand? And a bald
> head is not relevant when you are not going to shave your head in
> any case.
1) You haven't a clue what "more aerodynamic" means unless your helmet was
tested in a wind tunnel. Aerodymanics of low speed laminar flow shapes
cannot be estimated unless you have hundreds of hours in wind tunnel
research.
I have 10's of hours. What about you?
>> Oh, that's right - your proof of that proved just the opposite.
>
> Nope, and repeating yourself won't make it so.
In case you've missed it, short hair is in. Short hair has a great deal less
aerodynamic drag than a modern helmet. Modern helmets don't meet the Snell
Foundation crash standards and perhaps HALF of them do not meet the
'voluntary' ANSI standards because they are self-certified.
The fact of the matter is that wearing a helmet makes little if any sense
but then you'll defend helmets to the death. Hopefully at the hands of a
defective helmet.