Re: Puff Pastry



J

jjj

Guest
Is this all you can say? Every time I see your reply it is ______ is no low
carb.

"JC Der Koenig" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Pastry is not low carb.
>
> --
> Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW
>
>
> "elise" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >A real challenge - has anyone here successfully made a replacement for
Puff
> > pastry or should I just replace it with a few sheets of Filo??
> >
> > Just got a real craving for Chicken & Mushroom pie and I really fancy
the
> > 'bite'
> > of the pastry as it flakes(drool) the filling isn't enough on it's own,
> > somehow
> >
> >
> > --
> > Elise
> > http://uk.photos.yahoo.com/elisebutt
> >
> >
>
>
 
He has a very limited mind. He is doing the best he can now that he is on
his own out of the mental ward. I am not sure he takes his meds though. He
turned 50 and they released him for the first time. I am sure it is hard
for him.

Enjoy,
Curt


"jjj" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Is this all you can say? Every time I see your reply it is ______ is no
low
> carb.
>
> "JC Der Koenig" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Pastry is not low carb.
> >
> > --
> > Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. --
MFW
> >
> >
> > "elise" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >A real challenge - has anyone here successfully made a replacement for
> Puff
> > > pastry or should I just replace it with a few sheets of Filo??
> > >
> > > Just got a real craving for Chicken & Mushroom pie and I really fancy
> the
> > > 'bite'
> > > of the pastry as it flakes(drool) the filling isn't enough on it's
own,
> > > somehow
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Elise
> > > http://uk.photos.yahoo.com/elisebutt
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
 
Do you have a pistol or a gas oven?

--
Now ********. You cannot possibly be this stupid and remember to
breathe. You must be trolling. -- Carmen


"curt" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:rYYGd.3945$hC2.1985@trndny04...
> He has a very limited mind. He is doing the best he can now that he is on
> his own out of the mental ward. I am not sure he takes his meds though.
> He
> turned 50 and they released him for the first time. I am sure it is hard
> for him.
>
> Enjoy,
> Curt
>
>
> "jjj" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Is this all you can say? Every time I see your reply it is ______ is no
> low
>> carb.
>>
>> "JC Der Koenig" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> > Pastry is not low carb.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. --
> MFW
>> >
>> >
>> > "elise" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news:[email protected]...
>> > >A real challenge - has anyone here successfully made a replacement for
>> Puff
>> > > pastry or should I just replace it with a few sheets of Filo??
>> > >
>> > > Just got a real craving for Chicken & Mushroom pie and I really fancy
>> the
>> > > 'bite'
>> > > of the pastry as it flakes(drool) the filling isn't enough on it's
> own,
>> > > somehow
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Elise
>> > > http://uk.photos.yahoo.com/elisebutt
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
 
NOT low carb.

--
Now ********. You cannot possibly be this stupid and remember to
breathe. You must be trolling. -- Carmen


"jjj" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Is this all you can say? Every time I see your reply it is ______ is no
> low
> carb.
>
> "JC Der Koenig" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Pastry is not low carb.
>>
>> --
>> Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW
>>
>>
>> "elise" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> >A real challenge - has anyone here successfully made a replacement for
> Puff
>> > pastry or should I just replace it with a few sheets of Filo??
>> >
>> > Just got a real craving for Chicken & Mushroom pie and I really fancy
> the
>> > 'bite'
>> > of the pastry as it flakes(drool) the filling isn't enough on it's own,
>> > somehow
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Elise
>> > http://uk.photos.yahoo.com/elisebutt
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
 
JC Der Koenig wrote:
> Do you have a pistol or a gas oven?
>
Hey JC get a life. lol (turd+5)
I'm suprised JC's mommy lets him use his computer as much as she does.
Of course she is busy cleaning up after him, cooking his meals and
changing his poopy pants. I imagine after a long day of bashing people,
JC's just to tuckered out to have a real life.
 
"Bunky42" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:nx5Hd.37191$St.3507@fed1read03...
> JC Der Koenig wrote:
> > Do you have a pistol or a gas oven?
> >
> Hey JC get a life. lol (turd+5)
> I'm suprised JC's mommy lets him use his computer as much as she does.
> Of course she is busy cleaning up after him, cooking his meals and
> changing his poopy pants. I imagine after a long day of bashing people,
> JC's just to tuckered out to have a real life.

I have always appreciated when someone has told me the truth in regards
to my lifestyle or appearance. The truth though can be emotionally
upsetting. When a true statement is made, it usually sparks 1 of 2
reactions. A person will either get mad at somebody for pointing out a
fault, or they will be thankfull(though embarassed) for the "heads up". Both
reactions are not a "feel good thing" for the person being told. People
don't like to hear the truth because it hurts.
Statements like; "____ is not low carb", or, "Eat less exercise more" are
true facts. It's now up to the person to choose the reaction. If it is
because of being mad, it now becomes somewhat humerous watching the banter.
Sometimes it looks like a person is defending a whine.
JC normally doesn't become abusive unless the other person does, or if
there is past history. He is willing to offer reasonable advise if the
question asked is also reasonable. Most people just remember his blunt
replies to seemingly obvious (to us) twistings of the lo-carb philosophies.
Is a statement like, "Eating cake is what got you fat in the first
place." more of a truth? Or is it belligerent? If the reaction is anger,
perhaps the nail has been hit squarely on the head if such comments invoke
such emotion. JC and I are not buddies, so this is not in defence for him. I
just find that your replies to him are puzzling to me. But I can see why JC
says, "this or that is not lo-carb".
Tom
210/180/180
 
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:05:18 GMT, Tom G <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "Bunky42" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:nx5Hd.37191$St.3507@fed1read03...
>> JC Der Koenig wrote:
>> > Do you have a pistol or a gas oven?
>> >
>> Hey JC get a life. lol (turd+5)
>> I'm suprised JC's mommy lets him use his computer as much as she does.
>> Of course she is busy cleaning up after him, cooking his meals and
>> changing his poopy pants. I imagine after a long day of bashing people,
>> JC's just to tuckered out to have a real life.
>
> I have always appreciated when someone has told me the truth in
> regards
> to my lifestyle or appearance. The truth though can be emotionally
> upsetting. When a true statement is made, it usually sparks 1 of 2
> reactions. A person will either get mad at somebody for pointing out a
> fault, or they will be thankfull(though embarassed) for the "heads up".
> Both
> reactions are not a "feel good thing" for the person being told. People
> don't like to hear the truth because it hurts.
> Statements like; "____ is not low carb", or, "Eat less exercise more"
> are
> true facts. It's now up to the person to choose the reaction. If it is
> because of being mad, it now becomes somewhat humerous watching the
> banter.
> Sometimes it looks like a person is defending a whine.
> JC normally doesn't become abusive unless the other person does, or if
> there is past history. He is willing to offer reasonable advise if the
> question asked is also reasonable. Most people just remember his blunt
> replies to seemingly obvious (to us) twistings of the lo-carb
> philosophies.
> Is a statement like, "Eating cake is what got you fat in the first
> place." more of a truth? Or is it belligerent? If the reaction is anger,
> perhaps the nail has been hit squarely on the head if such comments
> invoke
> such emotion. JC and I are not buddies, so this is not in defence for
> him. I
> just find that your replies to him are puzzling to me. But I can see why
> JC
> says, "this or that is not lo-carb".
> Tom
> 210/180/180
>
>
>

There's nothing wrong with saying that someone eats too much or doesn't
exercise enough (or both). JC just happens to go beyond that and calls
people names. Personally, I don't find JC reasonable at all and killfiled
him long ago. If you like him, please continue to read his diatribe.

--
Bob in CT
 
"Bob M" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:eek:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:05:18 GMT, Tom G <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > "Bunky42" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:nx5Hd.37191$St.3507@fed1read03...
> >> JC Der Koenig wrote:
> >> > Do you have a pistol or a gas oven?
> >> >
> >> Hey JC get a life. lol (turd+5)
> >> I'm suprised JC's mommy lets him use his computer as much as she does.
> >> Of course she is busy cleaning up after him, cooking his meals and
> >> changing his poopy pants. I imagine after a long day of bashing people,
> >> JC's just to tuckered out to have a real life.
> >
> > I have always appreciated when someone has told me the truth in
> > regards
> > to my lifestyle or appearance. The truth though can be emotionally
> > upsetting. When a true statement is made, it usually sparks 1 of 2
> > reactions. A person will either get mad at somebody for pointing out a
> > fault, or they will be thankfull(though embarassed) for the "heads up".
> > Both
> > reactions are not a "feel good thing" for the person being told. People
> > don't like to hear the truth because it hurts.
> > Statements like; "____ is not low carb", or, "Eat less exercise more"
> > are
> > true facts. It's now up to the person to choose the reaction. If it is
> > because of being mad, it now becomes somewhat humerous watching the
> > banter.
> > Sometimes it looks like a person is defending a whine.
> > JC normally doesn't become abusive unless the other person does, or
if
> > there is past history. He is willing to offer reasonable advise if the
> > question asked is also reasonable. Most people just remember his blunt
> > replies to seemingly obvious (to us) twistings of the lo-carb
> > philosophies.
> > Is a statement like, "Eating cake is what got you fat in the first
> > place." more of a truth? Or is it belligerent? If the reaction is anger,
> > perhaps the nail has been hit squarely on the head if such comments
> > invoke
> > such emotion. JC and I are not buddies, so this is not in defence for
> > him. I
> > just find that your replies to him are puzzling to me. But I can see why
> > JC
> > says, "this or that is not lo-carb".
> > Tom
> > 210/180/180
> >
> >
> >
>
> There's nothing wrong with saying that someone eats too much or doesn't
> exercise enough (or both). JC just happens to go beyond that and calls
> people names. Personally, I don't find JC reasonable at all and killfiled
> him long ago. If you like him, please continue to read his diatribe.
>
> --
> Bob in CT

I view him as a resource of information only. I don't always agree with
his opinions. It is understandable why someone would not like the blunt
answers. I myself, have ruffled a few feathers. It is not with the intent to
hurt feelings, but sometimes it happens. Because of that, I'm sure that I'm
on somebody's killfile list. I do not have a killfile list, but there are
some posters that I may not read when I am busy. I don't have time to follow
all the threads, so I read the posts that interest me or posters that are
interesting because of their experience or common sense. I don't usually
follow JC's posts as soon as it becomes obvious that a squabble is taking
place.
Tom
 
"Tom G" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:S2eHd.114163$8l.76138@pd7tw1no...
>
> "Bob M" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:eek:[email protected]...
> > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:05:18 GMT, Tom G <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > "Bunky42" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:nx5Hd.37191$St.3507@fed1read03...
> > >> JC Der Koenig wrote:
> > >> > Do you have a pistol or a gas oven?
> > >> >
> > >> Hey JC get a life. lol (turd+5)
> > >> I'm suprised JC's mommy lets him use his computer as much as she does.
> > >> Of course she is busy cleaning up after him, cooking his meals and
> > >> changing his poopy pants. I imagine after a long day of bashing people,
> > >> JC's just to tuckered out to have a real life.
> > >
> > > I have always appreciated when someone has told me the truth in
> > > regards
> > > to my lifestyle or appearance. The truth though can be emotionally
> > > upsetting. When a true statement is made, it usually sparks 1 of 2
> > > reactions. A person will either get mad at somebody for pointing out a
> > > fault, or they will be thankfull(though embarassed) for the "heads up".
> > > Both
> > > reactions are not a "feel good thing" for the person being told. People
> > > don't like to hear the truth because it hurts.
> > > Statements like; "____ is not low carb", or, "Eat less exercise more"
> > > are
> > > true facts. It's now up to the person to choose the reaction. If it is
> > > because of being mad, it now becomes somewhat humerous watching the
> > > banter.
> > > Sometimes it looks like a person is defending a whine.
> > > JC normally doesn't become abusive unless the other person does, or
> if
> > > there is past history. He is willing to offer reasonable advise if the
> > > question asked is also reasonable. Most people just remember his blunt
> > > replies to seemingly obvious (to us) twistings of the lo-carb
> > > philosophies.
> > > Is a statement like, "Eating cake is what got you fat in the first
> > > place." more of a truth? Or is it belligerent? If the reaction is anger,
> > > perhaps the nail has been hit squarely on the head if such comments
> > > invoke
> > > such emotion. JC and I are not buddies, so this is not in defence for
> > > him. I
> > > just find that your replies to him are puzzling to me. But I can see why
> > > JC
> > > says, "this or that is not lo-carb".
> > > Tom
> > > 210/180/180
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > There's nothing wrong with saying that someone eats too much or doesn't
> > exercise enough (or both). JC just happens to go beyond that and calls
> > people names. Personally, I don't find JC reasonable at all and killfiled
> > him long ago. If you like him, please continue to read his diatribe.
> >
> > --
> > Bob in CT
>
> I view him as a resource of information only. I don't always agree with
> his opinions. It is understandable why someone would not like the blunt
> answers. I myself, have ruffled a few feathers. It is not with the intent to
> hurt feelings, but sometimes it happens. Because of that, I'm sure that I'm
> on somebody's killfile list. I do not have a killfile list, but there are
> some posters that I may not read when I am busy. I don't have time to follow
> all the threads, so I read the posts that interest me or posters that are
> interesting because of their experience or common sense. I don't usually
> follow JC's posts as soon as it becomes obvious that a squabble is taking
> place.
> Tom
>
Nah - not a squabble - just winding him up - I think he's hilarious!!!! I know I
shouldn't feed the troll but it's just too irresististable :)
Elise
180/175/140
 
"elise" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Tom G" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:S2eHd.114163$8l.76138@pd7tw1no...
> >
> > "Bob M" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:eek:[email protected]...
> > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:05:18 GMT, Tom G <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > "Bunky42" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:nx5Hd.37191$St.3507@fed1read03...
> > > >> JC Der Koenig wrote:
> > > >> > Do you have a pistol or a gas oven?
> > > >> >
> > > >> Hey JC get a life. lol (turd+5)
> > > >> I'm suprised JC's mommy lets him use his computer as much as she
does.
> > > >> Of course she is busy cleaning up after him, cooking his meals and
> > > >> changing his poopy pants. I imagine after a long day of bashing
people,
> > > >> JC's just to tuckered out to have a real life.
> > > >
> > > > I have always appreciated when someone has told me the truth in
> > > > regards
> > > > to my lifestyle or appearance. The truth though can be emotionally
> > > > upsetting. When a true statement is made, it usually sparks 1 of 2
> > > > reactions. A person will either get mad at somebody for pointing out
a
> > > > fault, or they will be thankfull(though embarassed) for the "heads
up".
> > > > Both
> > > > reactions are not a "feel good thing" for the person being told.
People
> > > > don't like to hear the truth because it hurts.
> > > > Statements like; "____ is not low carb", or, "Eat less exercise
more"
> > > > are
> > > > true facts. It's now up to the person to choose the reaction. If it
is
> > > > because of being mad, it now becomes somewhat humerous watching the
> > > > banter.
> > > > Sometimes it looks like a person is defending a whine.
> > > > JC normally doesn't become abusive unless the other person does,
or
> > if
> > > > there is past history. He is willing to offer reasonable advise if
the
> > > > question asked is also reasonable. Most people just remember his
blunt
> > > > replies to seemingly obvious (to us) twistings of the lo-carb
> > > > philosophies.
> > > > Is a statement like, "Eating cake is what got you fat in the
first
> > > > place." more of a truth? Or is it belligerent? If the reaction is
anger,
> > > > perhaps the nail has been hit squarely on the head if such comments
> > > > invoke
> > > > such emotion. JC and I are not buddies, so this is not in defence
for
> > > > him. I
> > > > just find that your replies to him are puzzling to me. But I can see
why
> > > > JC
> > > > says, "this or that is not lo-carb".
> > > > Tom
> > > > 210/180/180
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > There's nothing wrong with saying that someone eats too much or
doesn't
> > > exercise enough (or both). JC just happens to go beyond that and
calls
> > > people names. Personally, I don't find JC reasonable at all and
killfiled
> > > him long ago. If you like him, please continue to read his diatribe.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Bob in CT
> >
> > I view him as a resource of information only. I don't always agree
with
> > his opinions. It is understandable why someone would not like the blunt
> > answers. I myself, have ruffled a few feathers. It is not with the
intent to
> > hurt feelings, but sometimes it happens. Because of that, I'm sure that
I'm
> > on somebody's killfile list. I do not have a killfile list, but there
are
> > some posters that I may not read when I am busy. I don't have time to
follow
> > all the threads, so I read the posts that interest me or posters that
are
> > interesting because of their experience or common sense. I don't usually
> > follow JC's posts as soon as it becomes obvious that a squabble is
taking
> > place.
> > Tom
> >
> Nah - not a squabble - just winding him up - I think he's hilarious!!!! I
know I
> shouldn't feed the troll but it's just too irresististable :)
> Elise
> 180/175/140

O.K. I get it. Your attracted to him. Other girls find him irresistable
too.

I'm joking of course. :) And welcome to the group.
>
>
 
"Tom G" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:WNhHd.116624$Xk.49745@pd7tw3no...
>
> "elise" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "Tom G" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:S2eHd.114163$8l.76138@pd7tw1no...
>> >
>> > "Bob M" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news:eek:[email protected]...
>> > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:05:18 GMT, Tom G <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > "Bunky42" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > > > news:nx5Hd.37191$St.3507@fed1read03...
>> > > >> JC Der Koenig wrote:
>> > > >> > Do you have a pistol or a gas oven?
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> Hey JC get a life. lol (turd+5)
>> > > >> I'm suprised JC's mommy lets him use his computer as much as she
> does.
>> > > >> Of course she is busy cleaning up after him, cooking his meals and
>> > > >> changing his poopy pants. I imagine after a long day of bashing
> people,
>> > > >> JC's just to tuckered out to have a real life.
>> > > >
>> > > > I have always appreciated when someone has told me the truth in
>> > > > regards
>> > > > to my lifestyle or appearance. The truth though can be emotionally
>> > > > upsetting. When a true statement is made, it usually sparks 1 of 2
>> > > > reactions. A person will either get mad at somebody for pointing
>> > > > out
> a
>> > > > fault, or they will be thankfull(though embarassed) for the "heads
> up".
>> > > > Both
>> > > > reactions are not a "feel good thing" for the person being told.
> People
>> > > > don't like to hear the truth because it hurts.
>> > > > Statements like; "____ is not low carb", or, "Eat less exercise
> more"
>> > > > are
>> > > > true facts. It's now up to the person to choose the reaction. If it
> is
>> > > > because of being mad, it now becomes somewhat humerous watching the
>> > > > banter.
>> > > > Sometimes it looks like a person is defending a whine.
>> > > > JC normally doesn't become abusive unless the other person does,
> or
>> > if
>> > > > there is past history. He is willing to offer reasonable advise if
> the
>> > > > question asked is also reasonable. Most people just remember his
> blunt
>> > > > replies to seemingly obvious (to us) twistings of the lo-carb
>> > > > philosophies.
>> > > > Is a statement like, "Eating cake is what got you fat in the
> first
>> > > > place." more of a truth? Or is it belligerent? If the reaction is
> anger,
>> > > > perhaps the nail has been hit squarely on the head if such comments
>> > > > invoke
>> > > > such emotion. JC and I are not buddies, so this is not in defence
> for
>> > > > him. I
>> > > > just find that your replies to him are puzzling to me. But I can
>> > > > see
> why
>> > > > JC
>> > > > says, "this or that is not lo-carb".
>> > > > Tom
>> > > > 210/180/180
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > There's nothing wrong with saying that someone eats too much or
> doesn't
>> > > exercise enough (or both). JC just happens to go beyond that and
> calls
>> > > people names. Personally, I don't find JC reasonable at all and
> killfiled
>> > > him long ago. If you like him, please continue to read his diatribe.
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Bob in CT
>> >
>> > I view him as a resource of information only. I don't always agree
> with
>> > his opinions. It is understandable why someone would not like the blunt
>> > answers. I myself, have ruffled a few feathers. It is not with the
> intent to
>> > hurt feelings, but sometimes it happens. Because of that, I'm sure that
> I'm
>> > on somebody's killfile list. I do not have a killfile list, but there
> are
>> > some posters that I may not read when I am busy. I don't have time to
> follow
>> > all the threads, so I read the posts that interest me or posters that
> are
>> > interesting because of their experience or common sense. I don't
>> > usually
>> > follow JC's posts as soon as it becomes obvious that a squabble is
> taking
>> > place.
>> > Tom
>> >
>> Nah - not a squabble - just winding him up - I think he's hilarious!!!! I
> know I
>> shouldn't feed the troll but it's just too irresististable :)
>> Elise
>> 180/175/140
>
> O.K. I get it. Your attracted to him. Other girls find him irresistable
> too.
>

You're, not your.

Other than that, it was a good call though.
 
Tom G wrote:
> "Bunky42" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:nx5Hd.37191$St.3507@fed1read03...
>
>>JC Der Koenig wrote:
>>
>>>Do you have a pistol or a gas oven?
>>>
>>
>>Hey JC get a life. lol (turd+5)
>>I'm suprised JC's mommy lets him use his computer as much as she does.
>>Of course she is busy cleaning up after him, cooking his meals and
>>changing his poopy pants. I imagine after a long day of bashing people,
>>JC's just to tuckered out to have a real life.
>
>
> I have always appreciated when someone has told me the truth in regards
> to my lifestyle or appearance. The truth though can be emotionally
> upsetting. When a true statement is made, it usually sparks 1 of 2
> reactions. A person will either get mad at somebody for pointing out a
> fault, or they will be thankfull(though embarassed) for the "heads up". Both
> reactions are not a "feel good thing" for the person being told. People
> don't like to hear the truth because it hurts.
> Statements like; "____ is not low carb", or, "Eat less exercise more" are
> true facts. It's now up to the person to choose the reaction. If it is
> because of being mad, it now becomes somewhat humerous watching the banter.
> Sometimes it looks like a person is defending a whine.
> JC normally doesn't become abusive unless the other person does, or if
> there is past history. He is willing to offer reasonable advise if the
> question asked is also reasonable. Most people just remember his blunt
> replies to seemingly obvious (to us) twistings of the lo-carb philosophies.
> Is a statement like, "Eating cake is what got you fat in the first
> place." more of a truth? Or is it belligerent? If the reaction is anger,
> perhaps the nail has been hit squarely on the head if such comments invoke
> such emotion. JC and I are not buddies, so this is not in defence for him. I
> just find that your replies to him are puzzling to me. But I can see why JC
> says, "this or that is not lo-carb".
> Tom
> 210/180/180
>
>
>
Telling the truth is one thing, but JC is condescending. People come
here to get help and share ideas. JC doesn't help them, but does hurt
them. I think JC's a moron. He has an IQ just 5 points above a turd.
He's just here to **** people off and drive them away. People say just
add him to your KF. He needs to move to the proper NG like: alt.morons,
alt.idiots. There is plenty of room in these groups for him to spew his
******** and they would be happy to have him.
 
"JC Der Koenig" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Tom G" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:WNhHd.116624$Xk.49745@pd7tw3no...
> >
> > "elise" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >> "Tom G" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:S2eHd.114163$8l.76138@pd7tw1no...
> >> >
> >> > "Bob M" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> > news:eek:[email protected]...
> >> > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:05:18 GMT, Tom G <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > "Bunky42" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> > > > news:nx5Hd.37191$St.3507@fed1read03...
> >> > > >> JC Der Koenig wrote:
> >> > > >> > Do you have a pistol or a gas oven?
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> Hey JC get a life. lol (turd+5)
> >> > > >> I'm suprised JC's mommy lets him use his computer as much as she
> > does.
> >> > > >> Of course she is busy cleaning up after him, cooking his meals
and
> >> > > >> changing his poopy pants. I imagine after a long day of bashing
> > people,
> >> > > >> JC's just to tuckered out to have a real life.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I have always appreciated when someone has told me the truth
in
> >> > > > regards
> >> > > > to my lifestyle or appearance. The truth though can be
emotionally
> >> > > > upsetting. When a true statement is made, it usually sparks 1 of
2
> >> > > > reactions. A person will either get mad at somebody for pointing
> >> > > > out
> > a
> >> > > > fault, or they will be thankfull(though embarassed) for the
"heads
> > up".
> >> > > > Both
> >> > > > reactions are not a "feel good thing" for the person being told.
> > People
> >> > > > don't like to hear the truth because it hurts.
> >> > > > Statements like; "____ is not low carb", or, "Eat less
exercise
> > more"
> >> > > > are
> >> > > > true facts. It's now up to the person to choose the reaction. If
it
> > is
> >> > > > because of being mad, it now becomes somewhat humerous watching
the
> >> > > > banter.
> >> > > > Sometimes it looks like a person is defending a whine.
> >> > > > JC normally doesn't become abusive unless the other person
does,
> > or
> >> > if
> >> > > > there is past history. He is willing to offer reasonable advise
if
> > the
> >> > > > question asked is also reasonable. Most people just remember his
> > blunt
> >> > > > replies to seemingly obvious (to us) twistings of the lo-carb
> >> > > > philosophies.
> >> > > > Is a statement like, "Eating cake is what got you fat in the
> > first
> >> > > > place." more of a truth? Or is it belligerent? If the reaction is
> > anger,
> >> > > > perhaps the nail has been hit squarely on the head if such
comments
> >> > > > invoke
> >> > > > such emotion. JC and I are not buddies, so this is not in defence
> > for
> >> > > > him. I
> >> > > > just find that your replies to him are puzzling to me. But I can
> >> > > > see
> > why
> >> > > > JC
> >> > > > says, "this or that is not lo-carb".
> >> > > > Tom
> >> > > > 210/180/180
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > There's nothing wrong with saying that someone eats too much or
> > doesn't
> >> > > exercise enough (or both). JC just happens to go beyond that and
> > calls
> >> > > people names. Personally, I don't find JC reasonable at all and
> > killfiled
> >> > > him long ago. If you like him, please continue to read his
diatribe.
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Bob in CT
> >> >
> >> > I view him as a resource of information only. I don't always agree
> > with
> >> > his opinions. It is understandable why someone would not like the
blunt
> >> > answers. I myself, have ruffled a few feathers. It is not with the
> > intent to
> >> > hurt feelings, but sometimes it happens. Because of that, I'm sure
that
> > I'm
> >> > on somebody's killfile list. I do not have a killfile list, but there
> > are
> >> > some posters that I may not read when I am busy. I don't have time to
> > follow
> >> > all the threads, so I read the posts that interest me or posters that
> > are
> >> > interesting because of their experience or common sense. I don't
> >> > usually
> >> > follow JC's posts as soon as it becomes obvious that a squabble is
> > taking
> >> > place.
> >> > Tom
> >> >
> >> Nah - not a squabble - just winding him up - I think he's hilarious!!!!
I
> > know I
> >> shouldn't feed the troll but it's just too irresististable :)
> >> Elise
> >> 180/175/140
> >
> > O.K. I get it. Your attracted to him. Other girls find him
irresistable
> > too.
> >
>
> You're, not your.
>
> Other than that, it was a good call though.

Oops. You're right. :)

>
>
 
"Bunky42" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:69kHd.39393$St.16605@fed1read03...
> Tom G wrote:
> > "Bunky42" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:nx5Hd.37191$St.3507@fed1read03...
> >
> >>JC Der Koenig wrote:
> >>
> >>>Do you have a pistol or a gas oven?
> >>>
> >>
> >>Hey JC get a life. lol (turd+5)
> >>I'm suprised JC's mommy lets him use his computer as much as she does.
> >>Of course she is busy cleaning up after him, cooking his meals and
> >>changing his poopy pants. I imagine after a long day of bashing people,
> >>JC's just to tuckered out to have a real life.
> >
> >
> > I have always appreciated when someone has told me the truth in
regards
> > to my lifestyle or appearance. The truth though can be emotionally
> > upsetting. When a true statement is made, it usually sparks 1 of 2
> > reactions. A person will either get mad at somebody for pointing out a
> > fault, or they will be thankfull(though embarassed) for the "heads up".
Both
> > reactions are not a "feel good thing" for the person being told. People
> > don't like to hear the truth because it hurts.
> > Statements like; "____ is not low carb", or, "Eat less exercise more"
are
> > true facts. It's now up to the person to choose the reaction. If it is
> > because of being mad, it now becomes somewhat humerous watching the
banter.
> > Sometimes it looks like a person is defending a whine.
> > JC normally doesn't become abusive unless the other person does, or
if
> > there is past history. He is willing to offer reasonable advise if the
> > question asked is also reasonable. Most people just remember his blunt
> > replies to seemingly obvious (to us) twistings of the lo-carb
philosophies.
> > Is a statement like, "Eating cake is what got you fat in the first
> > place." more of a truth? Or is it belligerent? If the reaction is anger,
> > perhaps the nail has been hit squarely on the head if such comments
invoke
> > such emotion. JC and I are not buddies, so this is not in defence for
him. I
> > just find that your replies to him are puzzling to me. But I can see why
JC
> > says, "this or that is not lo-carb".
> > Tom
> > 210/180/180
> >
> >
> >
> Telling the truth is one thing, but JC is condescending. People come
> here to get help and share ideas. JC doesn't help them, but does hurt
> them.

The trouble usually starts with JC saying that the item in question "is
not low carb". Or responses of "eat less exercise more" if someone has
stalled or done something to thwart their weightloss efforts. For some
reason it is taken as a bad thing to be reminded of this. The thread quickly
downgrades from this point on. I don't see too many people responding with
something like, "O.K., maybe I shouldn't find a replacement for bread. Do
you have any ideas that I could use to make a replacement for sandwiches in
my brown bag lunch?"

> I think JC's a moron. He has an IQ just 5 points above a turd.
> He's just here to **** people off and drive them away. People say just
> add him to your KF.

I think lots of people killfile him because they are told to by others.


> He needs to move to the proper NG like: alt.morons,
> alt.idiots. There is plenty of room in these groups for him to spew his
> ******** and they would be happy to have him.

He can be nasty, but he's not an idiot. Few have his discipline. I can
respect that. I know many others feel differently.
 
Tom G wrote:

> JC and I are not buddies, so this is not in defence for him.
> Tom
> 210/180/180
>

But you have the same stats, so you MUST be JC! :-D
 
"Ada Ma" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Tom G wrote:
>
> > JC and I are not buddies, so this is not in defence for him.
> > Tom
> > 210/180/180
> >
>
> But you have the same stats, so you MUST be JC! :-D
>

I've seen his pics, but I don't know what his start and end weights are.
Did he start out at 210 as well?
 
"Tom G" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:rzDHd.127986$6l.84813@pd7tw2no...
>
> "Ada Ma" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>
>> Tom G wrote:
>>
>> > JC and I are not buddies, so this is not in defence for him.
>> > Tom
>> > 210/180/180
>> >
>>
>> But you have the same stats, so you MUST be JC! :-D
>>
>
> I've seen his pics, but I don't know what his start and end weights are.
> Did he start out at 210 as well?
>
>

240/180/180
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom Back