H
Hitchy
Guest
wrote:
> [i>
> >
> > --
> NB: When I say right of the lane i mean slightly right of centre. I was
> not hugging the right line. This is the motorcyclist in me coming
> out where being on the left is bad (cars seem to want to go around
> you if your doing 1km under the limit) and the middle is generally
> bad as it peaks and tends to be more slippery.
> Really?
> I do see your point thought that bicycles tend to ride on the left of
> the lane generally. I thought that in this particular case preventing
> the driver from going around my left when stationary would be a good
> thing. I didn't want to be in the left of the lane when going around a
> corner due to the common occurrance of cars deciding to merge left to
> park, which they seem to do with impunity down here making me consider
> an investment in disc brakes...
> I was under the impression that bicycles had the same legal standing on
> the roads as cars? Making undertaking me illegal. As they don't have the
> same physical standing, I would be really interested to know what "the
> done thing is" regarding this.
> Cheers, Brad
G'day Brad
I basically agree with Flyingdutch. I commute 3 or 4 days a week on th
treadly, about 95ks in melb peak traffic. The safest way to do a righ
hand turn (with arrows) is as Flyingdutch described. As for cyclist
having the same legal standing as cars.........you're right!....bu
you'll be telling it to the judge in a full body cast (if you live) i
you try to assert those rights to a 1.5 tonne car (& driver) who want
you out of his way....NOW
cheers
Hitch
-
> [i>
> >
> > --
> NB: When I say right of the lane i mean slightly right of centre. I was
> not hugging the right line. This is the motorcyclist in me coming
> out where being on the left is bad (cars seem to want to go around
> you if your doing 1km under the limit) and the middle is generally
> bad as it peaks and tends to be more slippery.
> Really?
> I do see your point thought that bicycles tend to ride on the left of
> the lane generally. I thought that in this particular case preventing
> the driver from going around my left when stationary would be a good
> thing. I didn't want to be in the left of the lane when going around a
> corner due to the common occurrance of cars deciding to merge left to
> park, which they seem to do with impunity down here making me consider
> an investment in disc brakes...
> I was under the impression that bicycles had the same legal standing on
> the roads as cars? Making undertaking me illegal. As they don't have the
> same physical standing, I would be really interested to know what "the
> done thing is" regarding this.
> Cheers, Brad
G'day Brad
I basically agree with Flyingdutch. I commute 3 or 4 days a week on th
treadly, about 95ks in melb peak traffic. The safest way to do a righ
hand turn (with arrows) is as Flyingdutch described. As for cyclist
having the same legal standing as cars.........you're right!....bu
you'll be telling it to the judge in a full body cast (if you live) i
you try to assert those rights to a 1.5 tonne car (& driver) who want
you out of his way....NOW
cheers
Hitch
-