I
Ilsa9
Guest
>Atlas [email protected]NOSPAMX wrote:
>
>x-no-archive: yes
>>
>>On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 01:16:26 GMT, in misc.health.alternative you
>>wrote:
>>
>>>An interesting summary of the problems with CBP:
>>>
>>>http://www.chirobase.org/06DD/cbp.html
>>>
>>>Basically says what many in m.h.a have said in the past... plenty of
>>>papers published on this technique, none demonstrating the VALIDITY or
>>>clinical relevancy of deviations from the supposed "ideal curvature of
>>>the spine".
>>>
>>>Interested to hear what some of the chiros have to say about this
>>>critique... especially the one who touts it here sometimes.
>>
>>Kirk,
>>
>> I tried to send you this via e-mail. However, Hotmail does not
>>recognize your listed address as valid.
>>
>>A Close Look at Chiropractic Biophysics (CBP)
>>Allen J. Botnick, DC, BA
>>
>>[Rebuttal by Dr. Smith]
>>
>
>It must be this "Dr" Smith, as Atlas is anything but a Dr.
>
>Atlas [email protected]NOSPAMX
>
Whoops! I forgot the link....
http://www.heptune.com/lis/smith.html
>
>x-no-archive: yes
>>
>>On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 01:16:26 GMT, in misc.health.alternative you
>>wrote:
>>
>>>An interesting summary of the problems with CBP:
>>>
>>>http://www.chirobase.org/06DD/cbp.html
>>>
>>>Basically says what many in m.h.a have said in the past... plenty of
>>>papers published on this technique, none demonstrating the VALIDITY or
>>>clinical relevancy of deviations from the supposed "ideal curvature of
>>>the spine".
>>>
>>>Interested to hear what some of the chiros have to say about this
>>>critique... especially the one who touts it here sometimes.
>>
>>Kirk,
>>
>> I tried to send you this via e-mail. However, Hotmail does not
>>recognize your listed address as valid.
>>
>>A Close Look at Chiropractic Biophysics (CBP)
>>Allen J. Botnick, DC, BA
>>
>>[Rebuttal by Dr. Smith]
>>
>
>It must be this "Dr" Smith, as Atlas is anything but a Dr.
>
>Atlas [email protected]NOSPAMX
>
Whoops! I forgot the link....
http://www.heptune.com/lis/smith.html