Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Re: Question RE: Gearing for Mountains

Started by Dirtroadie · · Last activity · 3 posts · 454 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
6 June 2005
Last activity
9 June 2005
Original author
Dirtroadie
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
454
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. App said:

    I am doing the Markleeville Death Ride (Sierra Nevada south of Lake
    Tahoe) this year and am dithering about gearing. Here are my bike
    options:

    1. Compact (50/34) crank with either 13-29 or 13-26
    2. 53/39 crank with 13-29

    I have never gotten into the 29 with the 53/39 around here (the hills
    of western Wisconsin) and have about 1400 miles since March plus ~500
    trainer "miles" since Jan. 1. I will have 2000+ road miles in by the
    time of the ride including a back-to-back century weekend.

    Having once done the Death Ride myself and trying to glean what I can
    from your description, I also would recommend the compact 13-29 setup.
    The climbs are much longer than what you are used to and they are at
    higher elevation as well. I did it comfortably with a 53/39 13-28 but I
    live at altitude and do long climbs regularly. I had never even had a
    28 on my bike for my normal riding but I used it regularly there.

    Nobody says you have to use the lowest gears just because you have
    them. In any case, you will not be likely to miss having the higher
    gears while you might sorely miss (pun intended) having the lower ones.

    DR

  2. I did the death ride in 1997 with a 39/26 low gear. I could have used a
    lower gear; it would have been nice. I was not a strong rider and on some
    hill plodded along at 4 mph standing at a low cadence.

    My friends and I had discussion on gearing, triple vs. double. I went for
    the double that I had. While eating at a local restaurant we met a fellow
    rider, he was 70 years old and this was going on his 5th deathride. He
    admitted on using a triple for the 1st time for this years ride since he is
    now 70 years old. I saw the 70 year on man on top of Carson pass (5th pass)
    before me!

    Key thing is train with the equipment you are going to use. I needed two
    years of training to complete the 5 passes. My 1st attempt I did only 3
    passes. On my 2nd attempt I trained more and loss 20 more pounds to lighten
    the load. My final hard training ride was to climb Mt. Hamilton in San Jose
    3 times in one day. This is about as bad as the deathride with 12000+ ft of
    climbing and 120 miles, with high heat, but without the rain and hail that
    you are likely to see on the deathride.

    cel

    "Dirtroadie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    App said:

    I am doing the Markleeville Death Ride (Sierra Nevada south of Lake
    Tahoe) this year and am dithering about gearing. Here are my bike
    options:

    1. Compact (50/34) crank with either 13-29 or 13-26
    2. 53/39 crank with 13-29

    I have never gotten into the 29 with the 53/39 around here (the hills
    of western Wisconsin) and have about 1400 miles since March plus ~500
    trainer "miles" since Jan. 1. I will have 2000+ road miles in by the
    time of the ride including a back-to-back century weekend.

    Having once done the Death Ride myself and trying to glean what I can
    from your description, I also would recommend the compact 13-29 setup.
    The climbs are much longer than what you are used to and they are at
    higher elevation as well. I did it comfortably with a 53/39 13-28 but I
    live at altitude and do long climbs regularly. I had never even had a
    28 on my bike for my normal riding but I used it regularly there.

    Nobody says you have to use the lowest gears just because you have
    them. In any case, you will not be likely to miss having the higher
    gears while you might sorely miss (pun intended) having the lower ones.

    DR

  3. Another opinion

    http://arniebakercycling.com/pubs/Free/Small%20Gears.pdf

    cel

    "Dirtroadie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    App said:

    I am doing the Markleeville Death Ride (Sierra Nevada south of Lake
    Tahoe) this year and am dithering about gearing. Here are my bike
    options:

    1. Compact (50/34) crank with either 13-29 or 13-26
    2. 53/39 crank with 13-29

    I have never gotten into the 29 with the 53/39 around here (the hills
    of western Wisconsin) and have about 1400 miles since March plus ~500
    trainer "miles" since Jan. 1. I will have 2000+ road miles in by the
    time of the ride including a back-to-back century weekend.

    Having once done the Death Ride myself and trying to glean what I can
    from your description, I also would recommend the compact 13-29 setup.
    The climbs are much longer than what you are used to and they are at
    higher elevation as well. I did it comfortably with a 53/39 13-28 but I
    live at altitude and do long climbs regularly. I had never even had a
    28 on my bike for my normal riding but I used it regularly there.

    Nobody says you have to use the lowest gears just because you have
    them. In any case, you will not be likely to miss having the higher
    gears while you might sorely miss (pun intended) having the lower ones.

    DR

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.