S
Squashme
Guest
On 19 May, 08:56, "John Rowland"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Squashmewrote:
> > On 19 May, 01:06, Conor <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> In article <8cee58e4-d2a4-47c3-bcde-9ea9fe6eb554
> >> @a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,Squashmesays...
>
> >>> "A single vehicle collisions"? Most confusing. Space-time continuum
> >>> gone bugger-up?
>
> >> Car collides with tree or other non vehicle object. Single vehicle
> >> collision.
>
> >> Do you not know what the definition of collision is?
>
> > No, but I have Google if I cared. I was assuming that Brimstone was
> > making some abstract joke with his "A single vehicle collisions". It
> > kind of appealed to me, but never mind. He may just have made an
> > error. Weird that, for a motorist.
>
> > But surely a car colliding with a tree, or a dangerous banana even,
> > still involves two objects? Still takes two to tango. A car hitting a
> > pedestrian could be seen as a single vehicle collision, I suppose. Two
> > objects, but only one vehicle?
>
> "Single vehicle collision" is the standard police description of a car
> driving into a bridge/tree/ditch.
Thanks
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Squashmewrote:
> > On 19 May, 01:06, Conor <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> In article <8cee58e4-d2a4-47c3-bcde-9ea9fe6eb554
> >> @a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,Squashmesays...
>
> >>> "A single vehicle collisions"? Most confusing. Space-time continuum
> >>> gone bugger-up?
>
> >> Car collides with tree or other non vehicle object. Single vehicle
> >> collision.
>
> >> Do you not know what the definition of collision is?
>
> > No, but I have Google if I cared. I was assuming that Brimstone was
> > making some abstract joke with his "A single vehicle collisions". It
> > kind of appealed to me, but never mind. He may just have made an
> > error. Weird that, for a motorist.
>
> > But surely a car colliding with a tree, or a dangerous banana even,
> > still involves two objects? Still takes two to tango. A car hitting a
> > pedestrian could be seen as a single vehicle collision, I suppose. Two
> > objects, but only one vehicle?
>
> "Single vehicle collision" is the standard police description of a car
> driving into a bridge/tree/ditch.
Thanks