Chuck Wright said:The latest issue of Bicycling Magazine (Sept. 2005) has a review of
a Pinarello F4:13 and, among many other things, they comment that
"it's also one of the sharpest-cornering bikes we've ever ridden -
your could practically rub your hip on the road and not worry about
blowing a turn."
Well, with that kind of hyperbole, I can't take anything these guys
wrote seriously. They visualize themselves as Motorcycle GP racers
cornering with their Teflon knee buttons sliding on the road.
Quoted message said:That got me to wondering if, by design, one bike can really corner
better than another and, if so, why? If cheap entry level bikes are
excluded and the comparison is limited to bikes with high quality
aluminum, carbon or Titanium frames and a reasonably good set of
wheels why would one bike be able to corner better than another?
Or, would the major factor simply be tire compound?
As the title claims, they are attributing this to the bicycle. The
only cornering of interest occurs when riding fast, not parking lot
gymnastics, so it cannot be the geometry of the bicycle because
significant changes in rake and trail are unacceptable to bicyclists
who do this sort of thing (in criteriums).
The testers apparently succumbed to marketing suggestions and possibly
some unnamed feature of the bicycle that made these inexperienced
testers believe what they were told. For instance, while working in
the auto business, I saw testers fooled by a "power kit" that one of
two otherwise identical cars was said to have. They found it improved
acceleration out of turns and was generally better. The power kit
consisted of a lighter gas pedal return spring.
Jobst Brandt