B
Bill Z.
Guest
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> writes:
> "Bill Z." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Sorsnon lies though his teeath as usual - the post in question had
> > nothing snipped except maybe one or two blank lines. It is also
> > not "cowardly" to snip text you are not responding to. It is rather
> > a courtesy to readers, who don't have to wade through irrelevant text,
> > and encouraged by usenet posting conventions.
> >
> > Sornson is apparently too stupid to know that.
>
> I have also noticed that you are snipping too much. You destroy context when
> you do that. It is what scoundrels do in order to make themselves look good
> at the expense of others. Note how Bill S and I do not normally snip much.
You don't snip much because both of you are idiots.
--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
> "Bill Z." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Sorsnon lies though his teeath as usual - the post in question had
> > nothing snipped except maybe one or two blank lines. It is also
> > not "cowardly" to snip text you are not responding to. It is rather
> > a courtesy to readers, who don't have to wade through irrelevant text,
> > and encouraged by usenet posting conventions.
> >
> > Sornson is apparently too stupid to know that.
>
> I have also noticed that you are snipping too much. You destroy context when
> you do that. It is what scoundrels do in order to make themselves look good
> at the expense of others. Note how Bill S and I do not normally snip much.
You don't snip much because both of you are idiots.
--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB