J
Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman
Guest
On Jun 16, 8:25 pm, Bill Sornson wrote:
> Johnny Sunset wrote:
> > On Jun 16, 4:13 pm, Bill Sornson wrote:
> >> Johnny Sunset wrote:
> >>> On Jun 16, 12:59 pm, R Brickston <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:21:47 -0700, Johnny Sunset wrote:
> >>>> ...
> >>>>> This is likely only the tip of the iceberg.
>
> >>>> Rather than go through point by point, here's why I think most of
> >>>> this is bs, Dems are in charge of both houses, why no committee
> >>>> hearings, panels and other inquisitions? In fact, the only outrage
> >>>> seems to come from the fringes.
>
> >>> Enough outrage in Ohio to elect Democrats in 2006, despite the
> >>> "structural" disadvantages.
>
> >>> The mainstream media and pundits would ridicule anyone who revisits
> >>> the earlier elections, with the stupid "get over it" retort.
>
> >> You've GOT to be kidding.
>
> > Oh please. How many "Sore/Loserman" comments were there at the end of
> > 2001?
>
> I hear more about how Gore "really won" that elelction now than ever before
> (other than immediately after). Hell, watch PMSNBC and it's either that or
> Scooter Libby, 24/7.
Buyer's remorse from the mainstream media that ignored all of Bush's
faults until it was too late?
> >>> Note that
> >>> Brickston uses the term "fringes", indicating he has the same
> >>> mindset.
>
> >>> Many Democrats feed from the same campaign contribution trough as
> >>> the Republicans. - "As long as I get mine, I won't rock the boat".
>
> >> Horseshit. If they could discredit the 2004 elelction by any means
> >> whatsoever, they would do it.
>
> >> You keep forgetting: the SHADOW GOVERNMENT! (Why else did they
> >> wait till well after the 2006 elections to indict William
> >> Jeffererson, D LA, for crimes committed -- on tape -- in 2004 and
> >> even earlier?!?)
>
> > Got to stop listening to so much talk radio or Faux News, or whatever
> > you get your wacko ideas from - they are more out there than Bill
> > Baka's 50-mph kiddie tricycle ride.
>
> You don't think the press "cooperated" in Macaca, Foley, Libby, etc. while
> all but completely ignoring Berger, Jefferson, and now Feinstein?!? (Her
> husband made millions fron defense contracts while she sat on the
> Appropriations Committee, and NO ONE says a word about it. Do you honestly
> think they'd ignore a Republican doing that?!?)
>
> Get real. (Not faux.)
The mainstream press gave a total pass on the BS that was being passed
off as "evidence" of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and ties to Al
Qaeda, until it was several years too late.
--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
> Johnny Sunset wrote:
> > On Jun 16, 4:13 pm, Bill Sornson wrote:
> >> Johnny Sunset wrote:
> >>> On Jun 16, 12:59 pm, R Brickston <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:21:47 -0700, Johnny Sunset wrote:
> >>>> ...
> >>>>> This is likely only the tip of the iceberg.
>
> >>>> Rather than go through point by point, here's why I think most of
> >>>> this is bs, Dems are in charge of both houses, why no committee
> >>>> hearings, panels and other inquisitions? In fact, the only outrage
> >>>> seems to come from the fringes.
>
> >>> Enough outrage in Ohio to elect Democrats in 2006, despite the
> >>> "structural" disadvantages.
>
> >>> The mainstream media and pundits would ridicule anyone who revisits
> >>> the earlier elections, with the stupid "get over it" retort.
>
> >> You've GOT to be kidding.
>
> > Oh please. How many "Sore/Loserman" comments were there at the end of
> > 2001?
>
> I hear more about how Gore "really won" that elelction now than ever before
> (other than immediately after). Hell, watch PMSNBC and it's either that or
> Scooter Libby, 24/7.
Buyer's remorse from the mainstream media that ignored all of Bush's
faults until it was too late?
> >>> Note that
> >>> Brickston uses the term "fringes", indicating he has the same
> >>> mindset.
>
> >>> Many Democrats feed from the same campaign contribution trough as
> >>> the Republicans. - "As long as I get mine, I won't rock the boat".
>
> >> Horseshit. If they could discredit the 2004 elelction by any means
> >> whatsoever, they would do it.
>
> >> You keep forgetting: the SHADOW GOVERNMENT! (Why else did they
> >> wait till well after the 2006 elections to indict William
> >> Jeffererson, D LA, for crimes committed -- on tape -- in 2004 and
> >> even earlier?!?)
>
> > Got to stop listening to so much talk radio or Faux News, or whatever
> > you get your wacko ideas from - they are more out there than Bill
> > Baka's 50-mph kiddie tricycle ride.
>
> You don't think the press "cooperated" in Macaca, Foley, Libby, etc. while
> all but completely ignoring Berger, Jefferson, and now Feinstein?!? (Her
> husband made millions fron defense contracts while she sat on the
> Appropriations Committee, and NO ONE says a word about it. Do you honestly
> think they'd ignore a Republican doing that?!?)
>
> Get real. (Not faux.)
The mainstream press gave a total pass on the BS that was being passed
off as "evidence" of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and ties to Al
Qaeda, until it was several years too late.
--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia