Re: Time to bomb Iran?



On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:04:42 -0500, "DI" <[email protected]> wrote:

>I'm 67, I know a lot about current events, but I especially know what kind
>of fool you are, you just sit behind your keyboard and try to agitate
>people. You are a worthless, ignorant, POS, try to get a life.



You've hit the nail on the head, DI, in spite of your advancing age!

Saint Ed is just someone humoring himself with his trolling. He
believes none of what he posts, he just gets good laughs out of it.

Unfortuately, some people here think it makes sense to argue with him.
 
Ozark Bicycle wrote:
>
> You can take the wine out of the jug (i.e., package in smaller
> containers), but you can't take the "jug wine" out of the (cheap,
> vile) wine. ;-)
>

Like anybody cared in 1969?
Bill Baka
 
On Jun 19, 10:15 pm, Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ozark Bicycle wrote:
>
> > You can take the wine out of the jug (i.e., package in smaller
> > containers), but you can't take the "jug wine" out of the (cheap,
> > vile) wine. ;-)

>
> Like anybody cared in 1969?
> Bill Baka


Like anybody was referring to 1969?

Have another toke.
 
Ozark Bicycle wrote:
> On Jun 19, 10:15 pm, Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Ozark Bicycle wrote:
>>
>>> You can take the wine out of the jug (i.e., package in smaller
>>> containers), but you can't take the "jug wine" out of the (cheap,
>>> vile) wine. ;-)

>> Like anybody cared in 1969?
>> Bill Baka

>
> Like anybody was referring to 1969?
>
> Have another toke.
>

Can't. I smoked it all.
 
On Jun 19, 10:24 pm, Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ozark Bicycle wrote:
> > On Jun 19, 10:15 pm, Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Ozark Bicycle wrote:

>
> >>> You can take the wine out of the jug (i.e., package in smaller
> >>> containers), but you can't take the "jug wine" out of the (cheap,
> >>> vile) wine. ;-)
> >> Like anybody cared in 1969?
> >> Bill Baka

>
> > Like anybody was referring to 1969?

>
> > Have another toke.

>
> Can't. I smoked it all.


And it shows.
 
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:58:52 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>I must admit I do enjoy playing the Devil's advocate - anything to stir up
>these slumbering cycling newsgroups.,


I don't think it's Devil's advocate you play at. I hope your childish
posts amuse you.

I'd suggest that going out and dating women would be more exciting and
might install some sense of reality in your life. Of course, that
would be assuming that you can participate in real life as opposed to
posting anonymously behind this fantasy persona you invented.
 
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:57:03 GMT, still me <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:58:52 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>I must admit I do enjoy playing the Devil's advocate - anything to stir up
>>these slumbering cycling newsgroups.,

>
>I don't think it's Devil's advocate you play at. I hope your childish
>posts amuse you.


Yeah, Devil's advocate still has to proceed from facts and try to come
up with alternative ideas, not just make stuff up.
--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************
 
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:49:49 -0400, John Forrest Tomlinson
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
>Yeah, Devil's advocate still has to proceed from facts and try to come
>up with alternative ideas, not just make stuff up.
>--
>JT


Saint ED is only concerned with how outrageous a post he can make in
hopes of trolling some more. He's not posting his beliefs or facts,
just nonsense trolling intended to grow the discussion so he can do
some more lame trolling.

The only thing worse than a troll is a lame, transparent troll.
 
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:14:33 -0700, Johnny Sunset
<[email protected]> wrote:

> E.D. is at the age
>where women significantly outnumber men.


Are you sure? He writes like a teenager who has good grammar skills
and not much other knowledge.
--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************