Road Cycling · Public discussion

Re: Troll posts to various cycling newsgroups

Started by Edward Dolan · · Last activity · 1 post · 371 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
27 September 2006
Last activity
27 September 2006
Original author
Edward Dolan
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
371
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Travis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    On this topic, I have a friend who is a web developer who is always
    looking for ideas to get into. I pitched an idea to him for creating a
    troll-free usenet gateway but he isn't convinced of its merits because
    he thinks Usenet is a dying medium.

    Your friend is quite right. Usenet is dying and will soon be as dead as the
    proverbial doornail. Just peruse some newsgroups and you will see what I
    mean. Nothing but idiots, morons and imbeciles everywhere you look.

    Quoted message said:

    My idea was basically that we'd create a Usenet gateway not unlike
    Google Groups, but with a twist.

    We'd start by appointing ourselves and a few trustworthy people from
    the newsgroups we post to as moderators.

    The moderators don't (and can't) actually block troll posts from going
    out to Usenet, but they are blocked from our site. People reading
    through our site will be given various options including the ability to
    view the newsgroups in fully filtered, flagged and unfiltered states.

    But the interestign bit is that anyone can be a moderator. Moderators
    vote in new moderators, if there aren't enough moderators in a
    newsgroup (say, 5) to have an internal vote, random moderators from
    other newsgroups (especially related ones) would be randomly drafted in
    by the system to review the wannabe's posting record and establish that
    they're a good guy or a troll.

    Similarly, moderators could be voted out if they turn out to abuse
    their power (for instance if a troll were somehow able to get himself
    granted moderator status and then went about being a nuisance.)

    A system of seniority (based on time as a moderator and some sort of
    voting system) would measure the trust levels of each moderator and
    could be a modifier in votes, i.e. highly trusted moderator's votes
    would count for more than a recently appointed moderator.

    I envisage something like a Wikipedia type system where the community
    as a whole work to keep the system clean of vandalism.

    Does anyone think this is a good idea?

    (If so, please say so in this thread, and I'll point this out to my
    skeptical web developer friend who might be tempted to knock together
    some kind of beta...)

    Travis

    It will never work because it is way too much work. All of us who post to
    Usenet are lazy as hell. And what would be the end result of all that work?
    A group so dull that everyone would want to kill themselves. Nay, you are
    better off with a few live wires like myself who will keep you on your toes.
    Actually, I should be charging something for my many services to the world
    of Usenet.

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.