Road Cycling · Public discussion

Re: uh, okay . . . .

Started by Bob Schwartz · · Last activity · 2 posts · 568 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
18 March 2008
Last activity
19 March 2008
Original author
Bob Schwartz
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
568
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. xzzy said:

    uh, what were they actually looking for?

    Well, they should have been looking for studies on
    its impact on recovery. I'm not sure that's what they
    were doing though.

    Bob Schwartz

  2. they seem to be ignoring it's help with recovery to try to build a case for
    something else

    "Bob Schwartz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    xzzy said:

    uh, what were they actually looking for?

    Well, they should have been looking for studies on
    its impact on recovery. I'm not sure that's what they
    were doing though.

    Bob Schwartz

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.