Subject: Re: Who is Baratz anyways? From: Tsu Dho Nimh [email hidden] Date: 7/7/2003 6:08 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>
Mark Probert said:
DEBBEE1023 said:
<< Except that he was chelating with the wrong drug for the metal he said needed to be gotten rid of. >> How would you personally know what drug this was? Aren't patient records private? Please cite where you got your information. I'm all ears.
Debbee, the information is in the original complaint filed by the State of Wisconsin and presumably came from the records that Kadile did maintain.
If you pay for the copying, you can get a copy of the filing and all the supporting documents, including the charts, etc.
Tsu
I note Mark said presumably. And how do you know these charts and documents were actually those of Dr Kadile??
I note Mark said presumably. And how do you know these charts and documents were actually those of Dr Kadile??
If they aren't, he has a slam-dunk case of perjury against the medical examiners and will have his license back in a heartbeat, won't he?
However, his defense is not that they are not his records, but that the quality of care documented therein is not substandard.
Tsu
-- To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection. - Jules Henri Poincaré
Subject: Re: Who is Baratz anyways? From: Tsu Dho Nimh [email hidden] Date: 7/7/2003 9:29 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>
(Jan) said:
I note Mark said presumably. And how do you know these charts and documents were actually those of Dr Kadile??
If they aren't, he has a slam-dunk case of perjury against the medical examiners and will have his license back in a heartbeat, won't he?
No, it appears you aren't aware of some of the tactics of organized medicine. I keep telling you debunkers to read Racketeering in Medicine, but it appears no one is interested.
Quoted message said:
However, his defense is not that they are not his records, but that the quality of care documented therein is not substandard.
I hope and pray his practice and life isn't riuned like some others I have read about.
Subject: Re: Who is Baratz anyways? From: Tsu Dho Nimh [email hidden] Date: 7/7/2003 9:29 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>
(Jan) said:
I note Mark said presumably. And how do you know these charts and documents were actually those of Dr Kadile??
If they aren't, he has a slam-dunk case of perjury against the medical examiners and will have his license back in a heartbeat, won't he?
No, it appears you aren't aware of some of the tactics of organized medicine. I keep telling you debunkers to read Racketeering in Medicine, but it appears no one is interested.
Quoted message said:
However, his defense is not that they are not his records, but that the quality of care documented therein is not substandard.
I hope and pray his practice and life isn't riuned like some others I have read about.
Jan
Well, Jan, this will be an interesting test case for the power of prayer. Let's see if God answers the prayers of a bigoted moron.
