C
Chris Foster
Guest
"S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:te1ng.15440$FR1.1967@dukeread05:
>
> "Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On 23 Jun 2006 15:21:08 GMT, Chris Foster
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I now understand that I need to use smaller, mono-syllable words to
>>>>>communicate with you and Conan the Librarian.
>>>>>
>>>>>The message is:
>>>>>
>>>>>"Stop wasting your time trying to convince a bunch of mountain
>>>>>bikers to stop mountain biking in a news group that supports
>>>>>mountain biking"
>>>>>
>>>>>"Get the laws changed in your area to ban mountain biking in the
>>>>>areas you would like to protect"
>>>>>
>>>>>Can I make that any simpler??
>>>>
>>>> No, but you COULD make it more truthful! (DUH!) The name
>>>> "alt.mountain-bike" identifies the TOPIC of the newsgroup, NOT
>>>> whether it is pro or con. (You should understand "pro" and "con",
>>>> since they only have one syl-la-ble.) Sheesh.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Once again, Mikey is way off base. The message is to actually
>>>accomplish something. You can NOT accomplish anything by trying to
>>>convince a bunch of mountain bikers to stop mountain biking in a news
>>>group that supports mountain biking.
>>
>> Exactly my point: alt.mountain-bike doesn't "support" anything. It's
>> just a TOPIC OF CONVERSATION. How can you claim any intelligence,
>> when you can't even grasp the most basic fact about newsgroups??????
> So what of people posting SUV performance tips in sci-environment...?
> Useful tips on destroying the environment would certainly fit your
> criteria for topic.
> pro and con... right?
>>
>>>I know you are anti-mountain bike. that means you are CON, duh, so
>>>what!
>>>
>>>I am neither PRO or CON on the subject. I am just enjoying stirring
>>>up the
>>>****. And you fall for it every time.
>>
>> I don't "fall" for anything. I just point out BS when I see (smell)
>> it. You got so hooked that you couldn't even take your own advice to
>> leave it alone. That's what addictive personalities are like.
>> ===
> The only thing you need to spot BS is a mirror. You call him
> "addictive" yet you could not hold back that drivel...? LOL
>
>
>
I enjoy stirring up the ****. You fall for it EVERY time. Since, you
are the turd that I stir up, I really doubt you could actually smell
yourself.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
news:te1ng.15440$FR1.1967@dukeread05:
>
> "Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On 23 Jun 2006 15:21:08 GMT, Chris Foster
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I now understand that I need to use smaller, mono-syllable words to
>>>>>communicate with you and Conan the Librarian.
>>>>>
>>>>>The message is:
>>>>>
>>>>>"Stop wasting your time trying to convince a bunch of mountain
>>>>>bikers to stop mountain biking in a news group that supports
>>>>>mountain biking"
>>>>>
>>>>>"Get the laws changed in your area to ban mountain biking in the
>>>>>areas you would like to protect"
>>>>>
>>>>>Can I make that any simpler??
>>>>
>>>> No, but you COULD make it more truthful! (DUH!) The name
>>>> "alt.mountain-bike" identifies the TOPIC of the newsgroup, NOT
>>>> whether it is pro or con. (You should understand "pro" and "con",
>>>> since they only have one syl-la-ble.) Sheesh.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Once again, Mikey is way off base. The message is to actually
>>>accomplish something. You can NOT accomplish anything by trying to
>>>convince a bunch of mountain bikers to stop mountain biking in a news
>>>group that supports mountain biking.
>>
>> Exactly my point: alt.mountain-bike doesn't "support" anything. It's
>> just a TOPIC OF CONVERSATION. How can you claim any intelligence,
>> when you can't even grasp the most basic fact about newsgroups??????
> So what of people posting SUV performance tips in sci-environment...?
> Useful tips on destroying the environment would certainly fit your
> criteria for topic.
> pro and con... right?
>>
>>>I know you are anti-mountain bike. that means you are CON, duh, so
>>>what!
>>>
>>>I am neither PRO or CON on the subject. I am just enjoying stirring
>>>up the
>>>****. And you fall for it every time.
>>
>> I don't "fall" for anything. I just point out BS when I see (smell)
>> it. You got so hooked that you couldn't even take your own advice to
>> leave it alone. That's what addictive personalities are like.
>> ===
> The only thing you need to spot BS is a mirror. You call him
> "addictive" yet you could not hold back that drivel...? LOL
>
>
>
I enjoy stirring up the ****. You fall for it EVERY time. Since, you
are the turd that I stir up, I really doubt you could actually smell
yourself.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com