Re: Why Does Vandeman ALWAYS Resort to INVENTING THREATS AND VIOLENCE?



C

Chris

Guest
< snip van-DUH-mans BS>

> Because it's impossible for me to understand such irrational people.


I will keep it as simple as I can for you.

1) You made an assertion (Black bears attack to protect cubs)
2) Your assertion was proven to be wrong
http://www.bear.org/Black/Black_Bear_Facts.html
3) I ask a simple question "why cant you admit you were wrong"


Question 1) How is that irrational?
Question 2) Why cant you admit you were wrong?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
On 14 Sep 2007 15:58:47 GMT, Chris <[email protected]>
wrote:

>< snip van-DUH-mans BS>
>
>> Because it's impossible for me to understand such irrational people.

>
>I will keep it as simple as I can for you.


After CONVENIENTLY removing the context, so no one can see just how
STOOPID you are.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> On 14 Sep 2007 15:58:47 GMT, Chris <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>< snip van-DUH-mans BS>
>>
>>> Because it's impossible for me to understand such irrational people.

>>
>>I will keep it as simple as I can for you.

>
> After CONVENIENTLY removing the context, so no one can see just how
> STOOPID you are.







OK van-DUH-man here is the old thread:

>>>>>>>Mike,
>>>>>>> In the thread "Black bear attacks mountain biker in Washington
>>>>>>> State
>>>>>>>park" your statement that black bears attack to defend their
>>>>>>>young. This assertion was proven wrong by two different people
>>>>>>>using two different lines of reasoning.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Simply put: You were wrong!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BS. Unless you are a bear, you don't know why they attack.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you were wrong then, how can I take anything you write
>>>>>>> seriously??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who is in for a rude awaking?? I think it is all of us.
>>>>>
>>>>>You can stick your head in the sand all you want. Your assertion
>>>>>was proven wrong. Didnt you even read the replies to your stupid
>>>>>statement. I will cut and paste it again for you and all to read
>>>>>once again:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>From a long list of characteristics, the last one listed
>>>>>at <http://www.bear.org/Black/Black_Bear_Facts.html> is
>>>>>
>>>>> Greatest misconception:
>>>>>
>>>>> The greatest misconception about black bears is that
>>>>> they are likely to attack people in defense of cubs.
>>>>> They are highly unlikely to do this.
>>>>
>>>> So they MIGHT do it. QED Can't you read?
>>>
>>>And a meteor MIGHT hit you in the forehead, but alas, it probably
>>>won't. You love to streatch the truth a bit to fit your odd sense of
>>>the world.
>>>
>>>Remember, I am not a mountain biker, therefore; you can not say "Why
>>>Do Mountain Bikers ALWAYS Resort to THREATS AND VIOLENCE?"

>>
>> But you are a mountain biker sympathizer. QED

>
>Nope ! I am a persom who likes to poke the trolls under the bridge
>with sharp sticks.
>
>Once again. You were wrong about your assertion. Why cant you admit
>it?


Because it's impossible for me to understand such irrational people.




Now, please answer the questions

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
On 17 Sep 2007 13:23:20 GMT, Chris <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote in
>news:[email protected]:
>
>> On 14 Sep 2007 15:58:47 GMT, Chris <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>< snip van-DUH-mans BS>
>>>
>>>> Because it's impossible for me to understand such irrational people.
>>>
>>>I will keep it as simple as I can for you.

>>
>> After CONVENIENTLY removing the context, so no one can see just how
>> STOOPID you are.

>
>
>
>
>
>
>OK van-DUH-man here is the old thread:
>
>>>>>>>>Mike,
>>>>>>>> In the thread "Black bear attacks mountain biker in Washington
>>>>>>>> State
>>>>>>>>park" your statement that black bears attack to defend their
>>>>>>>>young. This assertion was proven wrong by two different people
>>>>>>>>using two different lines of reasoning.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Simply put: You were wrong!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BS. Unless you are a bear, you don't know why they attack.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you were wrong then, how can I take anything you write
>>>>>>>> seriously??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who is in for a rude awaking?? I think it is all of us.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You can stick your head in the sand all you want. Your assertion
>>>>>>was proven wrong. Didnt you even read the replies to your stupid
>>>>>>statement. I will cut and paste it again for you and all to read
>>>>>>once again:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>From a long list of characteristics, the last one listed
>>>>>>at <http://www.bear.org/Black/Black_Bear_Facts.html> is
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Greatest misconception:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The greatest misconception about black bears is that
>>>>>> they are likely to attack people in defense of cubs.
>>>>>> They are highly unlikely to do this.
>>>>>
>>>>> So they MIGHT do it. QED Can't you read?
>>>>
>>>>And a meteor MIGHT hit you in the forehead, but alas, it probably
>>>>won't. You love to streatch the truth a bit to fit your odd sense of
>>>>the world.
>>>>
>>>>Remember, I am not a mountain biker, therefore; you can not say "Why
>>>>Do Mountain Bikers ALWAYS Resort to THREATS AND VIOLENCE?"
>>>
>>> But you are a mountain biker sympathizer. QED

>>
>>Nope ! I am a persom who likes to poke the trolls under the bridge
>>with sharp sticks.
>>
>>Once again. You were wrong about your assertion. Why cant you admit
>>it?

>
>Because it's impossible for me to understand such irrational people.


Thanks. Now you can understand my answer (on the line above).

>Now, please answer the questions

--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 

>>Now, please answer the questions


You are avoiding answering the question.


Why cant you admit you were wrong??



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 

Similar threads