EatMe said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/printer_611.shtml
Quoted message said:Go peddle your looney [censored] somewhere else asswipe.
Your cowering from the facts, although easily predicted,
is still rather amusing. Let's deal with the collaspe of
WTC7 and ignore your hysterical, childish outbursts.
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
Sheen had your ilk in mind when he correctly pointed out
that those who resort to childish nonsesne rather
than deal with the facts, only strengthen his case.
Thanks.
You 18%ers are absolutely terrified of the truth, and
it shows in every one of your childish rants. <chuckle>
So, you really believe that a few small random fires caused
every steel support column in WTC7 to shatter and fail completely
at exactly the same instant? Have you ever heated any steel? It
will slowly bend if it gets hot enough - it won't instantly shatter
into pieces.
WTC7 collapsed straight down in perfect symmetry at near free fall
speed even though the vast majority of the steel frame was undamaged,
and wasn't exposed to any fire. The owner of the building even
acknowledged that he had it "pulled", which is a term for demolished - although he later claimed that he didn't mean what he said.
Doesn't the fact that even steel framed building that have been
subjected to far hotter and longer fires have never collapsed
(even slowly) prior to or since 9-11 mean anything to you? It's
like watching a bike fall off its side stand and seeing the
entire machine, frame included, turn into a pile of broken
metal and plastic instead of just bending a handlebar. How do
you explain it logically?
The fire theory also forces believers to ignore the pools of
molten metal found in the rubble of WTC7. If a theory forces
you to ignore or deny key facts and evidence, isn't time to
consider a more plausible theory - one that easily fits =all=
the evidence...
Look at the height of WTC7:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/9-11%20Picture1.jpg
Then look at how it collapsed:
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
Small random fires can't possibly make a steel framed building
do that. Not even a raging inferno can cause a steel building to
do anything even remotely close to that. Only a very well executed controlled demolition can cause the total, instant, and symmetric
failure of =all= steel support columns that took place in WTC7.
I just can't believe that isn't obvious to anyone who gives it a
close look.
We're talking about a very solidly braced and virtually undamaged
steel frame. Look at the still photos at 1 second intervals. That
building stays =perfectly= straight all the way down. It's very
clearly a picture perfect controlled demolition.
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end.
http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
--
http://www.st911.org
"The new America, born in sin and arrogance, delusional
in Manifest Destiny, bred in overabundant gluttony,
consumerist and materialist, fathered by George W. Bush,
[censored] Cheney and the Cabal of Criminality, a country flocked
by sheeple, ignorant and conditioned, indifferent to a world
growing up around it, living delusions of empire and of
omnipotence, building hatred against it and its policies
throughout the planet, slowly dumbing down its citizens,
losing its edge in the sciences and arts, producing a nation
of acquiescent automatons brainwashed to never question
authority and always faithfully follow the crimes of governance."
- Manuel Valenzuela