Re: yippee, I'm (gonna be) a cycle-commuter again



E

Edward Dolan

Guest
"Tom Keats" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] writes:
>> Congrat's.
>> Tell me, if your potential employer insisted you not wear a helmet,
>> would you agree?

>
> Sure, as long as they pay the fine if I get busted for
> riding without wearing a helmet.


Tom Keats is law breaker. That is because he is a dumb working class slob on
the docks of Vancouver (Canada). Laws are for others, not for him. He is
nothing but a criminal. I wish I were in Vancouver so I could report him to
the police. I good long stay in prison would cure him of his infantile "I am
above the law" working class fantasies.

Why is he posting to BC? I thought that group had died and gone to hell long
ago. Or is Tom Keats the despicable DiscoDuck (DD) who monopolizes BC and is
the most notorious scofflaw ever to come along in the entire history of
Usenet. He breaks the laws with nary a concern and even encourages others to
break the laws. My contempt for such types is boundless!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Tom Keats" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] writes:
> >> Congrat's.
> >> Tell me, if your potential employer insisted you not wear a helmet,
> >> would you agree?

> >
> > Sure, as long as they pay the fine if I get busted for
> > riding without wearing a helmet.

>
> Tom Keats is law breaker. That is because he is a dumb working class slob on
> the docks of Vancouver (Canada). Laws are for others, not for him. He is
> nothing but a criminal. I wish I were in Vancouver so I could report him to
> the police.


You can. It's easy to find the Vancouver police using google. But the
police here don't care about that law (most of them, anyway).
As a matter of fact yesterday, I saw three police officers helpfully
offering directions to a bare headed cyclist. Thankfully they
recognized they weren't hurting anybody.

> I good long stay in prison would cure him of his infantile "I am
> above the law" working class fantasies.

No, it wouldn't. Because I AM ABOVE THAT LAW.
Just like the police are above many laws (recent rash of beatings of
civilians, speeding, parking illegally).
Just like our politicians are above many laws.

> Why is he posting to BC? I thought that group had died and gone to hell long
> ago. Or is Tom Keats the despicable DiscoDuck (DD) who monopolizes BC and is
> the most notorious scofflaw ever to come along in the entire history of
> Usenet. He breaks the laws with nary a concern and even encourages others to
> break the laws. My contempt for such types is boundless!

As is my contempt for you.

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the fruitcake- Minnesota
 
> Tom Keats is law breaker. That is because he is a dumb working class slob on
> the docks of Vancouver (Canada). Laws are for others, not for him. He is
> nothing but a criminal. I wish I were in Vancouver so I could report him to
> the police.


You can. It's easy to find the Vancouver police using google. But the

police here don't care about that law (most of them, anyway).
As a matter of fact yesterday, I saw three police officers helpfully
offering directions to a bare headed cyclist. Thankfully they
recognized they weren't hurting anybody.

> I good long stay in prison would cure him of his infantile "I am
> above the law" working class fantasies.


No, it wouldn't. Because I AM ABOVE THAT LAW.
Just like the police are above many laws (recent rash of beatings of
civilians, speeding, parking illegally).
Just like our politicians are above many laws.

> Why is he posting to BC? I thought that group had died and gone to hell long
> ago. Or is Tom Keats the despicable DiscoDuck (DD) who monopolizes BC and is
> the most notorious scofflaw ever to come along in the entire history of
> Usenet. He breaks the laws with nary a concern and even encourages others to
> break the laws. My contempt for such types is boundless!



As is my contempt for you. Hunt me down, edward. Lets see who is
stronger.

> Ed Dolan the fruitcake - Minnesota
 
"DiscoDuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>> Tom Keats is law breaker. That is because he is a dumb working class slob
>> on
>> the docks of Vancouver (Canada). Laws are for others, not for him. He is
>> nothing but a criminal. I wish I were in Vancouver so I could report him
>> to
>> the police.

>
> You can. It's easy to find the Vancouver police using google. But the
> police here don't care about that law (most of them, anyway).
> As a matter of fact yesterday, I saw three police officers helpfully
> offering directions to a bare headed cyclist. Thankfully they
> recognized they weren't hurting anybody.
>
>> I good long stay in prison would cure him of his infantile "I am
>> above the law" working class fantasies.

>
> No, it wouldn't. Because I AM ABOVE THAT LAW.
> Just like the police are above many laws (recent rash of beatings of
> civilians, speeding, parking illegally).
> Just like our politicians are above many laws.


Laws are there for a good reason or they aren't. If they aren't, then they
ought to be repealed. To have laws on the books that are not being observed
brings nothing but contempt for all law. If I were a policeman in Vancouver,
I would take you into custody, after giving you a good clubbing of course.

>> Why is he posting to BC? I thought that group had died and gone to hell
>> long
>> ago. Or is Tom Keats the despicable DiscoDuck (DD) who monopolizes BC and
>> is
>> the most notorious scofflaw ever to come along in the entire history of
>> Usenet. He breaks the laws with nary a concern and even encourages others
>> to
>> break the laws. My contempt for such types is boundless!

>
>
> As is my contempt for you. Hunt me down, edward. Lets see who is
> stronger.


It must be nice to have your own little cycling newsgroup there in BC where
you can pontificate like the jackass that you are. You should get together
with Tom Keats, also of Vancouver. He is another nut like you and the two of
you could make beautiful music together.

By the way, I wouldn't be caught dead in Vancouver or soggy old Victoria
either. You have got to have water on the brain to live in a pest hole like
British Columbia. Why the hell don't you move to Seattle where the police
there would teach you some respect for the laws, you confounded criminal.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> Laws are there for a good reason or they aren't. If they aren't, then they
> ought to be repealed.


Law are seldom (if ever) repealed. But yes, the helmet one should be.

> To have laws on the books that are not being observed
> brings nothing but contempt for all law.


Wrong again. The things stopping me from murder, rape and theft is NOT
the fact it is illegal. It's the fact my conscious prohibits doing
such acts.

But again you're correct. Such laws do bring down the credibility of
the law, its enforcement and the politicians that pass them.


> If I were a policeman in Vancouver,
> I would take you into custody, after giving you a good clubbing of course.


No you wouldn't, You're too chicken. Clubbing is against the law.

> It must be nice to have your own little cycling newsgroup there in BC where
> you can pontificate like the jackass that you are. You should get together
> with Tom Keats, also of Vancouver. He is another nut like you and the two of
> you could make beautiful music together.


You are the one that states all laws must be obeyed and you're calling
US nuts?

> By the way, I wouldn't be caught dead in Vancouver or soggy old Victoria
> either. You have got to have water on the brain to live in a pest hole like
> British Columbia. Why the hell don't you move to Seattle where the police
> there would teach you some respect for the laws, you confounded criminal.


IT really hurts my feelings when you call me names.
I spend lots of time bareheaded time in Seattle and so far the police
have elected not to teach me anything. Why, are bicycle helmets there
manditory?
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Goof- Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"DiscoDuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:

[...]
>> By the way, I wouldn't be caught dead in Vancouver or soggy old Victoria
>> either. You have got to have water on the brain to live in a pest hole
>> like
>> British Columbia. Why the hell don't you move to Seattle where the police
>> there would teach you some respect for the laws, you confounded criminal.

>
> IT really hurts my feelings when you call me names.
> I spend lots of time bareheaded time in Seattle and so far the police
> have elected not to teach me anything. Why, are bicycle helmets there
> manditory?


How the hell would I know? But If I were cycling anywhere I would make damn
sure I was obeying whatever laws were in force and I would not be blabbing
all over Usenet like an idiot how it is OK not to obey some laws. You are
nothing but a scofflaw, not fit to live in a civilized society.

If you don't want to be called names, then get to be a law-abiding citizen.
Leave the law-breaking to the hoodlums and the other human scum that infest
every large city in North America.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "DiscoDuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:

> [...]
> >> By the way, I wouldn't be caught dead in Vancouver or soggy old Victoria
> >> either. You have got to have water on the brain to live in a pest hole
> >> like
> >> British Columbia. Why the hell don't you move to Seattle where the police
> >> there would teach you some respect for the laws, you confounded criminal.

> >
> > IT really hurts my feelings when you call me names.
> > I spend lots of time bareheaded time in Seattle and so far the police
> > have elected not to teach me anything. Why, are bicycle helmets there
> > manditory?

>
> How the hell would I know? But If I were cycling anywhere I would make damn
> sure I was obeying whatever laws were in force and I would not be blabbing
> all over Usenet like an idiot how it is OK not to obey some laws.


Well it is OK so too bad. I'm going to go out and break that same law
again just to **** you off, right now.

> You are
> nothing but a scofflaw, not fit to live in a civilized society.


Making someone wear a helmet when they don't want to, is not civilized.

> If you don't want to be called names, then get to be a law-abiding citizen.
> Leave the law-breaking to the hoodlums and the other human scum that infest
> every large city in North America.


Sorry, let me finish weeping. (sniff sniff). There. You were saying,
Fruitcake?

Regards,
>

Ed Dolan the nutbar- Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"DiscoDuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "DiscoDuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> > Edward Dolan wrote:

>> [...]
>> >> By the way, I wouldn't be caught dead in Vancouver or soggy old
>> >> Victoria
>> >> either. You have got to have water on the brain to live in a pest hole
>> >> like
>> >> British Columbia. Why the hell don't you move to Seattle where the
>> >> police
>> >> there would teach you some respect for the laws, you confounded
>> >> criminal.
>> >
>> > IT really hurts my feelings when you call me names.
>> > I spend lots of time bareheaded time in Seattle and so far the police
>> > have elected not to teach me anything. Why, are bicycle helmets there
>> > manditory?

>>
>> How the hell would I know? But If I were cycling anywhere I would make
>> damn
>> sure I was obeying whatever laws were in force and I would not be
>> blabbing
>> all over Usenet like an idiot how it is OK not to obey some laws.

>
> Well it is OK so too bad. I'm going to go out and break that same law
> again just to **** you off, right now.


You are going to get knocked off of your bike by a motor vehicle and land on
your stupid head - and it will serve you right!

>> You are
>> nothing but a scofflaw, not fit to live in a civilized society.

>
> Making someone wear a helmet when they don't want to, is not civilized.


If you do not like the law, then work to get it changed. It is evil to break
the law, but it is an even greater evil to advocate that others do so. You
are not an ordinary scum bag, but a truly evil scum bag.

>> If you don't want to be called names, then get to be a law-abiding
>> citizen.
>> Leave the law-breaking to the hoodlums and the other human scum that
>> infest
>> every large city in North America.

>
> Sorry, let me finish weeping. (sniff sniff). There. You were saying,
> Fruitcake?


I am saying that you are human scum yourself. Learn to read between the
lines why don't you?

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "DiscoDuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> "DiscoDuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >> >
> >> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> >> By the way, I wouldn't be caught dead in Vancouver or soggy old
> >> >> Victoria
> >> >> either. You have got to have water on the brain to live in a pest hole
> >> >> like
> >> >> British Columbia. Why the hell don't you move to Seattle where the
> >> >> police
> >> >> there would teach you some respect for the laws, you confounded
> >> >> criminal.
> >> >
> >> > IT really hurts my feelings when you call me names.
> >> > I spend lots of time bareheaded time in Seattle and so far the police
> >> > have elected not to teach me anything. Why, are bicycle helmets there
> >> > manditory?
> >>
> >> How the hell would I know? But If I were cycling anywhere I would make
> >> damn
> >> sure I was obeying whatever laws were in force and I would not be
> >> blabbing
> >> all over Usenet like an idiot how it is OK not to obey some laws.

> >
> > Well it is OK so too bad. I'm going to go out and break that same law
> > again just to **** you off, right now.

>
> You are going to get knocked off of your bike by a motor vehicle and land on
> your stupid head - and it will serve you right!


You've been say that for ages and it STILL hasn't happenned. And you
know what? Ain't gonna happen.

> >> You are
> >> nothing but a scofflaw, not fit to live in a civilized society.

> >
> > Making someone wear a helmet when they don't want to, is not civilized.

>
> If you do not like the law, then work to get it changed.


No. Too much work and I don't feel like engaging people such as
yourself who have no sense about them.
Besides it's easier for me to simply ride the bike helmetless. And
MOST police leave me alone (although I avoid them when I can as I
cannot tell the difference between those who are trying to good by
stopping criminals, and those who simply like exercising thier
authority.

> It is evil to break
> the law, but it is an even greater evil to advocate that others do so. You
> are not an ordinary scum bag, but a truly evil scum bag.


See that is the problem with you safety zealots-you see someone who
wants the choice for themselves, the same as Ted Bundy.

> >> If you don't want to be called names, then get to be a law-abiding
> >> citizen.
> >> Leave the law-breaking to the hoodlums and the other human scum that
> >> infest
> >> every large city in North America.

> >
> > Sorry, let me finish weeping. (sniff sniff). There. You were saying,
> > Fruitcake?

>
> I am saying that you are human scum yourself. Learn to read between the
> lines why don't you?


I wonder what you look like? You must be one of those control hungry
cops.

> Regards,
>

Ed Dolan the dufus - Minnesota
 
"DiscoDuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "DiscoDuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> > Edward Dolan wrote:
>> >> "DiscoDuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >> news:[email protected]...
>> >> >
>> >> > Edward Dolan wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >> >> By the way, I wouldn't be caught dead in Vancouver or soggy old
>> >> >> Victoria
>> >> >> either. You have got to have water on the brain to live in a pest
>> >> >> hole
>> >> >> like
>> >> >> British Columbia. Why the hell don't you move to Seattle where the
>> >> >> police
>> >> >> there would teach you some respect for the laws, you confounded
>> >> >> criminal.
>> >> >
>> >> > IT really hurts my feelings when you call me names.
>> >> > I spend lots of time bareheaded time in Seattle and so far the
>> >> > police
>> >> > have elected not to teach me anything. Why, are bicycle helmets
>> >> > there
>> >> > manditory?
>> >>
>> >> How the hell would I know? But If I were cycling anywhere I would make
>> >> damn
>> >> sure I was obeying whatever laws were in force and I would not be
>> >> blabbing
>> >> all over Usenet like an idiot how it is OK not to obey some laws.
>> >
>> > Well it is OK so too bad. I'm going to go out and break that same law
>> > again just to **** you off, right now.

>>
>> You are going to get knocked off of your bike by a motor vehicle and land
>> on
>> your stupid head - and it will serve you right!

>
> You've been say that for ages and it STILL hasn't happenned. And you
> know what? Ain't gonna happen.


It only needs to happen once and you are toast.

>> >> You are
>> >> nothing but a scofflaw, not fit to live in a civilized society.
>> >
>> > Making someone wear a helmet when they don't want to, is not civilized.

>>
>> If you do not like the law, then work to get it changed.

>
> No. Too much work and I don't feel like engaging people such as
> yourself who have no sense about them.
> Besides it's easier for me to simply ride the bike helmetless. And
> MOST police leave me alone (although I avoid them when I can as I
> cannot tell the difference between those who are trying to good by
> stopping criminals, and those who simply like exercising thier
> authority.


Just don't be advocating that others also break the law. That is just too
despicable for words.

>> It is evil to break
>> the law, but it is an even greater evil to advocate that others do so.
>> You
>> are not an ordinary scum bag, but a truly evil scum bag.

>
> See that is the problem with you safety zealots-you see someone who
> wants the choice for themselves, the same as Ted Bundy.


No one has the right to choose what laws they are going to observe and what
laws they are not going to observe. That way lies anarchy.

>> >> If you don't want to be called names, then get to be a law-abiding
>> >> citizen.
>> >> Leave the law-breaking to the hoodlums and the other human scum that
>> >> infest
>> >> every large city in North America.
>> >
>> > Sorry, let me finish weeping. (sniff sniff). There. You were saying,
>> > Fruitcake?

>>
>> I am saying that you are human scum yourself. Learn to read between the
>> lines why don't you?

>
> I wonder what you look like? You must be one of those control hungry
> cops.


The cops are the only force (the thin blue line) that stand between us being
ruled by criminal gangs and being ruled by our elected representatives. I
prefer to live in a republic rather than under a despotic tyranny.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> > You've been say that for ages and it STILL hasn't happenned. And you
> > know what? Ain't gonna happen.

>
> It only needs to happen once and you are toast.

But you said it WOULD happen, and it won't. The chances are literally
MILLIONS to one.

> Just don't be advocating that others also break the law. That is just too
> despicable for words.


Never have encouraged anyone to break the law. I encourage them to
CHOOSE for themselves.

By the way, if it wasn't for some law breakers, we'd still have some
awful laws in place. So WE NEED LAW BREAKERS.
For instance, Rosie Parks. What a woman!

> No one has the right to choose what laws they are going to observe and what
> laws they are not going to observe. That way lies anarchy.


I DO have the right and DO Choose what laws to obey. try and stop me,
Eddy.

> The cops are the only force (the thin blue line) that stand between us being
> ruled by criminal gangs and being ruled by our elected representatives. I
> prefer to live in a republic rather than under a despotic tyranny.


Then go find one to live in, as the republic you dream of, is going
going going, gone!
 
"DiscoDuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> > You've been say that for ages and it STILL hasn't happenned. And you
>> > know what? Ain't gonna happen.

>>
>> It only needs to happen once and you are toast.

>
> But you said it WOULD happen, and it won't. The chances are literally
> MILLIONS to one.


You are an incurable idiot! Your stupidity is unconquerable!

>> Just don't be advocating that others also break the law. That is just too
>> despicable for words.

>
> Never have encouraged anyone to break the law. I encourage them to
> CHOOSE for themselves.


You are an incurable idiot! Your stupidity is unconquerable!

> By the way, if it wasn't for some law breakers, we'd still have some
> awful laws in place. So WE NEED LAW BREAKERS.
>
> For instance, Rosie Parks. What a woman!


You are an incurable idiot! Your stupidity is unconquerable!

>> No one has the right to choose what laws they are going to observe and
>> what
>> laws they are not going to observe. That way lies anarchy.

>
> I DO have the right and DO Choose what laws to obey. try and stop me,
> Eddy.


You are an incurable idiot! Your stupidity is unconquerable!

>> The cops are the only force (the thin blue line) that stand between us
>> being
>> ruled by criminal gangs and being ruled by our elected representatives. I
>> prefer to live in a republic rather than under a despotic tyranny.

>
> Then go find one to live in, as the republic you dream of, is going
> going going, gone!


You are an incurable idiot! Your stupidity is unconquerable!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "DiscoDuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> > You've been say that for ages and it STILL hasn't happenned. And you
> >> > know what? Ain't gonna happen.
> >>
> >> It only needs to happen once and you are toast.

> >
> > But you said it WOULD happen, and it won't. The chances are literally
> > MILLIONS to one.

>
> You are an incurable idiot! Your stupidity is unconquerable!


Denying facts is what makes an idiot. Therefore Edward you are the
reigning king of idiots.

> >> Just don't be advocating that others also break the law. That is just too
> >> despicable for words.

> >
> > Never have encouraged anyone to break the law. I encourage them to
> > CHOOSE for themselves.

>
> You are an incurable idiot! Your stupidity is unconquerable!

Denying facts is what makes an idiot. Therefore Edward you are the
reigning king of idiots.
>
> > By the way, if it wasn't for some law breakers, we'd still have some
> > awful laws in place. So WE NEED LAW BREAKERS.
> >
> > For instance, Rosie Parks. What a woman!

>
> You are an incurable idiot! Your stupidity is unconquerable!

Denying facts is what makes an idiot. Therefore Edward you are the
reigning king of idiots.
>
> >> No one has the right to choose what laws they are going to observe and
> >> what
> >> laws they are not going to observe. That way lies anarchy.

> >
> > I DO have the right and DO Choose what laws to obey. try and stop me,
> > Eddy.

>
> You are an incurable idiot! Your stupidity is unconquerable!

Denying facts is what makes an idiot. Therefore Edward you are the
reigning king of idiots.
>
> >> The cops are the only force (the thin blue line) that stand between us
> >> being
> >> ruled by criminal gangs and being ruled by our elected representatives. I
> >> prefer to live in a republic rather than under a despotic tyranny.

> >
> > Then go find one to live in, as the republic you dream of, is going
> > going going, gone!

>
> You are an incurable idiot! Your stupidity is unconquerable!

Denying facts is what makes an idiot. Therefore Edward you are the
reigning king of idiots.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"Tom Keats" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "DiscoDuck" <[email protected]> writes:
>
>>> You are an incurable idiot! Your stupidity is unconquerable!

>>
>> Denying facts is what makes an idiot. Therefore Edward you are the
>> reigning king of idiots.

>
> Hey, DD - please don't do this to me.
>
> I didn't post about MHLs or stupido-torpedoes like Ed Dolan;
> I posted about being able to ride to work, particularly in
> the Vancouver/ Lower Mainland area, and the pleasant joys thereof.
>
> I implore you to remove rec.bicycles.misc from the x-post list
> in your replies. If you must cross-post, replace rec.bicycles.misc
> with soc.men and alt.usenet.kooks. And maybe invoke the name of
> Little Meow.


I have got LM (freaking Little Meow) down as a ***** and a **** because she
is into fornication without any procreation involved. But here we can see
that Tom Keats approves of such behavior. That is most likely because he
is a sexual slob and a degenerate himself.

> If/when Little Ed replies and adds alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent or
> rec.bicycles.misc to the cross-post list ... please remove it,
> if you absolutely must respond to the useless little skidmark.
>
> Better yet -- don't respond to it at all. There is nothing
> of value to be gained.
>
> If you could talk about nice things about riding instead of
> concentrating on MHLs, that would be good too.


That BC cycling newsgroup is a one-man affair run by DD (Disco Duck). It is
as dead as a door nail because he has killed it with all this insane rants
about not wearing a helmet. In short, DD is as crazy as a Minnesota loon.

But Tom Keats is not much better. He would like to fob me off on other
criminal newsgroups when I am the most sane person ever to post to any
cycling newsgroup. Tom Keats is a nut himself. He works like a dog all day
on the Vancouver docks and no doubt thinks this is a virtuous thing to be
doing, although it gives him no real satisfaction. And so he posts his dumb
messages to RBM seeking some outlet for his frustrations in life. But the
Great Ed Dolan has taken the measure of him and knows him for what he is -
just another poor dumb working slob who would like to be better than he is.

The solution for all these morons is to avail themselves of the wisdom of
the Great Ed Dolan, but that they will never do because they fancy
themselves the equal of me. I just die laughing at the thought of it. DD and
Tom Keats on the same level as the Great Ed Dolan? How totally absurd!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota