On Dec 31, 10:35 am, Ryan Cousineau <
[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> William Asher <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > William Asher <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]
> > 130.133.1.4:
>
> > >http://tinyurl.com/yuxwpe
>
> > hi-res version:
>
> >http://tinyurl.com/gzual
>
> But is it art?
>
> My theory is that collectively, the USN's carrier fleets comprise the
> single grandest sculpture project ever conceived.
>
> I'd have to figure out if they actually outweigh the pyramids, but given
> that they could destroy the pyramids, I say the points go to the USN.
Well, if you think the narrative of art history
through the ages should be conducted as an episode
of BattleBots (and there are some good arguments
for this), then I think you have a winner.
Otherwise, it makes sense to argue that an aircraft
carrier is not art, but a photograph of an aircraft
carrier is art. (Or at least it is depending on your
taste.) One could make the same argument about
Half Dome versus a photograph of Half Dome, or a sunset,
or Lange's "Migrant Mother."
There's also a school of thought that if you see it in a
museum or buy it at an "art store" (in the manner of TK),
it's art. Whether an aircraft carrier is art then depends
on whether you think Northrop Grumman is also an art gallery.
Ben
RBR Chief Aesthetics Officer