Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Professional Cycling
- Published
- 8 August 2007
- Last activity
- 9 August 2007
- Original author
- Doctor.House
- Posts
- 4
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 953
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
Original postDoctor.House
Archived post
#1
Duh!
Only the cover stories evolve. Yet never really change.
Doping is a constant:
The basic tools of public relations/marketing remain:
1) empty denials
2) emphatic denial
3) angry denial
4) 501c (3) Charitable works doping apology Chinese Wall
5) media support, myths and weekly denial
6) Bio-marker profiles
7) "so-called independent testing"
8) WADA supervision
9) TV Network themes
10) ignorant fans
-
#2
"Repetitve doping leads to repetitive posts"
So are you saying that you dope repetitively?
-
#3
Trev_S said:"Repetitve doping leads to repetitive posts"
So are you saying that you dope repetitively?
LOL, that is a classic.
-
#4
Doctor.House said:Duh!
Only the cover stories evolve. Yet never really change.
Doping is a constant:
The basic tools of public relations/marketing remain:
1) empty denials
2) emphatic denial
3) angry denial
4) 501c (3) Charitable works doping apology Chinese Wall
5) media support, myths and weekly denial
6) Bio-marker profiles
7) "so-called independent testing"
8) WADA supervision
9) TV Network themes
10) ignorant fans
And like repetitive doping, repetitive posts are being dealt with
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users
·
0 guests
·0 bots
·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.