A
Amy Blankenship
Guest
"george conklin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Amy Blankenship" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "george conklin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "Scott M. Kozel" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> "Amy Blankenship" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I see you've learned one of George Conklin's less admirable
>>>>> techniques...If
>>>>> someone disagrees with you or questions you further, declare the
>>>>> comment/question irrelevant, drivel, or nonsensical. Nice
>>>>
>>>> Because George is tired of seeing the same refuted arguments
>>>> posted over and over again. After a certain point there is
>>>> no need to be polite.
>>>
>>> It is like talking to religious fanatics. No amount of good research
>>> ever can change beliefs, espeically when no one even bother to look at
>>> probability and risk. If you post a refereed article, they just say,
>>> "You already posted that." After that, they back to whatever horse they
>>> were riding.
>>
>> Yes, that's exactly how it feels to try to debate with you.
>>
>
> You just can't stand refereed sources over your own sad emotions.
You as well...
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Amy Blankenship" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "george conklin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "Scott M. Kozel" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> "Amy Blankenship" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I see you've learned one of George Conklin's less admirable
>>>>> techniques...If
>>>>> someone disagrees with you or questions you further, declare the
>>>>> comment/question irrelevant, drivel, or nonsensical. Nice
>>>>
>>>> Because George is tired of seeing the same refuted arguments
>>>> posted over and over again. After a certain point there is
>>>> no need to be polite.
>>>
>>> It is like talking to religious fanatics. No amount of good research
>>> ever can change beliefs, espeically when no one even bother to look at
>>> probability and risk. If you post a refereed article, they just say,
>>> "You already posted that." After that, they back to whatever horse they
>>> were riding.
>>
>> Yes, that's exactly how it feels to try to debate with you.
>>
>
> You just can't stand refereed sources over your own sad emotions.
You as well...