"Craig Brossman" <
[email protected]> wrote:
>"Alan McClure" <
[email protected]> wrote
>> This may be a simple/stupid question, but what the hell difference is there between having a
>> riser bar and a stem that
>has
>> more of an inclined angle to raise a flat bar up? It doesn't seem to me, that there would be any
>> difference, but I'm sure I'm wrong, or why would riser bars even exist. Don't tell me it is a
>> style thing.
>Fair question, and probably there is very little difference, but in general, it seems that risers
>are a little wider than mot flat bars and they also bend back a bit. Personally, I like the
>increased width of my risers and since I ride very few trails with close trees, I don't miss
>shorter flat bars.
I've done both - I used to ride very narrow, tree-lined trails and ended up cutting an inch off each
end of my (already narrow) straight bars. That isn't what I'd do now that I ride in wide-open
Arizona (trees? What are trees?).
>Also, with risers, you can rotate them front or back, thus changing the reach a bit as well. In
>small, subtle ways, it seems to me that risers give you a little more adjustability than flats w/ a
>higher stem. YMMV.
Craig got it dead on. If you have a flat bar and riser with the same sweep and the same width,
there would be no difference at all (other than the fact the flat bar/riser stem combo would weigh
less). Heh.
Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles
http://www.habcycles.com Home of the $695 ti frame