D
David Reuteler
Guest
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 07:53:28 +0000, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
> On a treadless tire, it's difficult to know how much of the tread has worn unless you remove it
> from the rim.
David L. Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
: I don't see why. Look at the tire surface. Do you see casing? If so, it is worn out.
that only tells you when it's worn out. you still have difficulty knowing "how much of the tread has
worn unless you remove it from the rim," as mike originally said. he's right, that's a downside of
slicks. oh, well. no big deal.
--
david reuteler [email protected]
> On a treadless tire, it's difficult to know how much of the tread has worn unless you remove it
> from the rim.
David L. Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
: I don't see why. Look at the tire surface. Do you see casing? If so, it is worn out.
that only tells you when it's worn out. you still have difficulty knowing "how much of the tread has
worn unless you remove it from the rim," as mike originally said. he's right, that's a downside of
slicks. oh, well. no big deal.
--
david reuteler [email protected]