Eldron said:
Ok so when does the probation end? When do we stop seeing a pimple on a cyclist's face and call him a doper? When do we see anybody win anything without calling them a doper?
Is there ever going to be an end or do we just carry on yelling "doper"? It's a bit like crying wolf forever...
I don't think it will end until you see the likes of Johan Bruyneel's teams actually riding like everyone else instead of standing out.
We all know that 1 week preparation for the Giro was ********. That is despite the fact that
every cycling media outlet I've heard or read repeats this mantra like witless zombies. That includes a U.K. outfit, which I hoped would be more realistic than the easy-to-satisy U.S. sports media.
His team comes into the Giro with, what, a realistic one month prep and not only does well, they win it with a rider, who's good but NOT God, who's been "vacationing".
Astana was rewarded by the RCS for lighting up the pelaton. They repaid RCS by winning their Grand Tour. I heard the entire 3 weeks about how RCS wanted a great and exciting race for the spectators. I do not recall hearing, during the entire Giro, on the fact that they wanted a clean race. That is not their emphasis.
It makes me deeply disappointed to realize that cycling only preaches about wanting to be clean. The truth is, they want great performances and for the riders to
not get caught or, God forbid, die from their meddling with their bodies like that.
I know it isn't just cycling. Here in the U.S. baseball fans love to cheer home runs and then, become outraged, years later when that overly muscled hero turned out to be a 'Roid-Boy. But they still want to see those home runs.
I find it difficult to read a lot of the distrust in just about all of the performances in riders all during the season. I want to believe that some of them are making an effort to clean up.
But the fact is, while some may be trying, they will lose in the end. The winners are the dopers as they take home the trophies, applause and money for their efforts.