M
Manfred Dötsch
Guest
Hi, after having done my first IM in August I am currently training for next year's season where I
would like to do two or three IM's. I wonder wheather it would be advantageous to change my
running style.
Back-Food First: If you wear running shoes, you intuitively run in such a way that the back part of
your foot (the heel) touches the ground first, before the front-foot follows.
Front-Foot First: However, if you run without shoes, you intuitively avoid the hard impact by
touching the ground with your front-foot first, followed by the heel.
Observations: After starting to run "front-food-first" for only half an hour, I had extremely sore
muscles in my calfs and it took me some weeks to get my calfs accustomed to "front-foot-frst".
When switching back to "back-foot-first" after running "front-foot-first" for, say, one hour, you
suddenly notice the comparatively hard impacts on your body.
My conclusion on this: From the evolutionary point of view, humans are designed to run
"front-food-first". The "back-food-first" is only made possible by modern running shoes.
The sore muscles in my calfs indicated that I didn't use this muscle. Since it's not effective to
carry around "useless weight" I might just as well put this muscle to work, too.
Running in such a way evolution designed us, putting to work all the muscles we have (including the
calf) and avoiding hard impacts suggests to me a more effective way of running using the
"front-foot-first" style. Theoretically. But, more important, what is your experience ?
It would be great if you could post your preferred running style and if possible any experiences
while switching from one style to the other.
Thank you, Manfred (Germany)
would like to do two or three IM's. I wonder wheather it would be advantageous to change my
running style.
Back-Food First: If you wear running shoes, you intuitively run in such a way that the back part of
your foot (the heel) touches the ground first, before the front-foot follows.
Front-Foot First: However, if you run without shoes, you intuitively avoid the hard impact by
touching the ground with your front-foot first, followed by the heel.
Observations: After starting to run "front-food-first" for only half an hour, I had extremely sore
muscles in my calfs and it took me some weeks to get my calfs accustomed to "front-foot-frst".
When switching back to "back-foot-first" after running "front-foot-first" for, say, one hour, you
suddenly notice the comparatively hard impacts on your body.
My conclusion on this: From the evolutionary point of view, humans are designed to run
"front-food-first". The "back-food-first" is only made possible by modern running shoes.
The sore muscles in my calfs indicated that I didn't use this muscle. Since it's not effective to
carry around "useless weight" I might just as well put this muscle to work, too.
Running in such a way evolution designed us, putting to work all the muscles we have (including the
calf) and avoiding hard impacts suggests to me a more effective way of running using the
"front-foot-first" style. Theoretically. But, more important, what is your experience ?
It would be great if you could post your preferred running style and if possible any experiences
while switching from one style to the other.
Thank you, Manfred (Germany)