aboylikedave said:
Thanks for helping. But, according to the first reply, mass relative to pedals will be the same on either frane. I've checked the specs and the 17.5" (correct size for my inseam) and 20" (a bit big for a hybrid as it leaves only 1" of clearance) only have a 0.5degree difference in geometry. Can't make that much difference can it?
Every LBS says 20 " is a bit too big for me for clearance, but I always need to have the saddle full back. So what I'm really trying to find out is if I will be happy on a smaller frame.
What measurement/criterion are you using for the fore-aft position of the seat? That's the first question.
Are you putting your seat so far back because it feels better with the handlebar position, or because it is what's needed to get the right pedaling position?
Pedaling (seat fore-aft) position should come first (using "knee above pedal spindle" or a a variation of that). Then you adjust the stem on your handlebars to fit the reach for comfort.
If your seat is back because it's necessary for pedaling position, maybe you nead a seat post with more "set back". That sets the seat further back without being at the end of the rails. They make various set backs; you might just need one with more than the one you have.
If the seat is so far back simply because you want a longer reach, you should set it according to pedaling position, then get a longer stem to achieve the comfortable reach.
As for the 1/2 degree difference in the seat post angle, it will make a difference - more of a difference the higher your seat is. It only takes an inch (2.5 cm) to be pretty significant on your seat rails.
It would be easy enough to measure the difference - set the seat height the same on the two bikes, and the fore-aft position the same. Drop a plumb bob (or use a level in the vertical position) from the nose of the saddle and measure horizontally to the pedal spindle.
It could also be calculated using the seat tube angle and seat height, but I'm way too far away from trig. to do it myself!