J
jtaylor
Guest
"Richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Richard Bates wrote:
> > I'm guessing that having two brakes on the front wheel may allow
> > better control. The point between a brake providing maximum
> > deceleration and locking the wheel is quite fine. Let's call this the
> > "critical brake point". Sharing the force between two brakes, both
> > more distance from the CBP could perhaps give better deceleration with
> > less risk of wheel-locking?
>
> An interesting point. And I think the answer is no.
>
> If the two brakes are totally independent of each other and (for the
> sake of argument) approximately identical, and the rider is experienced
> enough to reach critical point on both more or less simultaneously, you
> will have twice the braking force (and hence twice the deceleration).
No. The "critical point" is is determined by the weight and geometry of the
cycle/rider combination, not by the number, size, type, colour, price,
etcetera of the brake(s).
news:[email protected]...
> Richard Bates wrote:
> > I'm guessing that having two brakes on the front wheel may allow
> > better control. The point between a brake providing maximum
> > deceleration and locking the wheel is quite fine. Let's call this the
> > "critical brake point". Sharing the force between two brakes, both
> > more distance from the CBP could perhaps give better deceleration with
> > less risk of wheel-locking?
>
> An interesting point. And I think the answer is no.
>
> If the two brakes are totally independent of each other and (for the
> sake of argument) approximately identical, and the rider is experienced
> enough to reach critical point on both more or less simultaneously, you
> will have twice the braking force (and hence twice the deceleration).
No. The "critical point" is is determined by the weight and geometry of the
cycle/rider combination, not by the number, size, type, colour, price,
etcetera of the brake(s).