Seen tonight.

[Martin]

Just got in, and whilst I was out I saw this:

http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&h...9665,-2.620725&spn=0.000471,0.001389&t=h&z=20

 

[Clive George]

"Martin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Just got in, and whilst I was out I saw this:
>
> http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&h...9665,-2.620725&spn=0.000471,0.001389&t=h&z=20

No, still doesn't make sense to me

cheers,
clive

 

"Martin" <[email protected]> skrev i en meddelelse
news:[email protected]...
>
> Just got in, and whilst I was out I saw this:
>
> http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&h...9665,-2.620725&spn=0.000471,0.001389&t=h&z=20
>

You saw a parked car. Still there - even if the google picture is a year
old.

Strange - I admit.

;-)
tomov

 

[Paul Boyd]

On 07/06/2008 01:15, Martin said,
>
> Just got in, and whilst I was out I saw this:
>
> http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&h...9665,-2.620725&spn=0.000471,0.001389&t=h&z=20

Go on then, spill the beans ;-)

--
Paul Boyd
http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

 

[Brownz \(Mobile\)]

Martin wrote:
> Just got in, and whilst I was out I saw this:
>
> http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&h...9665,-2.620725&spn=0.000471,0.001389&t=h&z=20

You saw a road - and it was so good you posted it twice - well done - have a
lollipop.

--
Cheerz - Brownz
'89 K100RS
'53 JCW MCS (Cage)
http://www.brownz.org/

 

[Tom Crispin]

On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:50:36 +0100, "Brownz \(Mobile\)"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Martin wrote:
>> Just got in, and whilst I was out I saw this:
>>
>> http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&h...9665,-2.620725&spn=0.000471,0.001389&t=h&z=20
>
>You saw a road - and it was so good you posted it twice - well done - have a
>lollipop.

The optional cycle lane, if that is what it is and not a bus lane, is
unusually wide for an optional cycle lane.

 

[Brownz \(Mobile\)]

Tom Crispin wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:50:36 +0100, "Brownz \(Mobile\)"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Martin wrote:
>>> Just got in, and whilst I was out I saw this:
>>>
>>> http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&h...9665,-2.620725&spn=0.000471,0.001389&t=h&z=20
>>
>> You saw a road - and it was so good you posted it twice - well done
>> - have a lollipop.
>
> The optional cycle lane, if that is what it is and not a bus lane, is
> unusually wide for an optional cycle lane.

Wooo ...... fap fap fap fap.

--
Cheerz - Brownz
'89 K100RS
'53 JCW MCS (Cage)
http://www.brownz.org/

 

[Martin]

Tom Crispin wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:50:36 +0100, "Brownz \(Mobile\)"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Martin wrote:
>>> Just got in, and whilst I was out I saw this:
>>>
>>> http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&h...9665,-2.620725&spn=0.000471,0.001389&t=h&z=20
>> You saw a road - and it was so good you posted it twice - well done - have a
>> lollipop.

Thankyou, I like lollipops.
The first post never re-appeared on my computer, and I though it got
lost in the ether.


> The optional cycle lane, if that is what it is and not a bus lane, is
> unusually wide for an optional cycle lane.

Correct, you win the banana.
At this point the advisory cycle lane going uphill (left to right) is
wider than the adjacent general purpose lane.
It thins out at the top, and is also thinner further down.

My guess is that the cycle lane is actually a traffic calming/road
narrowing measure. The cycle lanes on this road are the only ones of any
decent width that I have seen in Bristol.