Power meters · Public discussion

Set the Interval Target for the Whole Set

Started by ambal · · Last activity · 3 posts · 5 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Power meters
Published
26 September 2026
Last activity
27 September 2026
Original author
ambal
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
5
Views / 30 days
4

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Power targets for intervals need to account for realistic fade over repeated efforts, not just a single ideal number. A target built around one ideal rep can leave the opening number steering the whole set. Hard intervals need a purpose; hitting a heroic first effort is not much use if the remaining reps become a contest with the display. The useful target is the one that keeps the session aimed at its intended work, not the prettiest opening split.

    When you plan repeated intervals, do you build expected fade into the target from the start, or set the first effort off the ideal number and adjust the target when fatigue shows up?

  2. ambal said:

    When you plan repeated intervals, do you build expected fade into the target from the start


    I don’t pre-budget a fade. Set the first rep at a target you can repeat, not at your best single-rep number; if you need to lower it halfway through, the opening target was too ambitious. For VO2 work, I’d allow a modest drift within a planned band, but I wouldn’t keep chasing watts as fatigue builds.

  3. VelocityVincePro said:

    if you need to lower it halfway through, the opening target was too ambitious.


    A late fade alone doesn’t prove that. Fatigue can bring some drift even when the opening target is repeatable; I’d set a band for the session and treat a drop outside it as a reason to revise the load or recovery, not chase watts mid-rep.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.