skydive69 said:I have three different computers and they each list a different circumference setting for a 700x25 tire - what am I missing?
I just purchased a new Cat-Eye 300 computer and want to set it up properly for my Specialized Roubaix Pro.
Interestingly, that is not even treated universally. One company says to simply measure the circumference, and another says after measuring the circumference, subtract 4 mm to make up for the difference when the rider's weight is on the bicycle. I guess the engineer in me cries out for exact, universal information which apparently ain't going to happen!gruppo said:Measure the circumference of the tire and enter it manually.
Apparently the best method is to roll out the distance whilst sitting on the bike. I do this by marking a spot on the tyre and rolling along a tape measure close to a wall to keep balance. Seems to work.skydive69 said:Interestingly, that is not even treated universally. One company says to simply measure the circumference, and another says after measuring the circumference, subtract 4 mm to make up for the difference when the rider's weight is on the bicycle. I guess the engineer in me cries out for exact, universal information which apparently ain't going to happen!
I concur. I finally decided to do the tire measurement manually, and using the method described in the Polar manual (measure the circumference and then subtract 4 mm), my measurement came out to exactly their recommended setting for a 700x25 tire - 2105.drewjc said:Apparently the best method is to roll out the distance whilst sitting on the bike. I do this by marking a spot on the tyre and rolling along a tape measure close to a wall to keep balance. Seems to work.
Tesla* said:my measurement came out to exactly their recommended setting for a 700x25 tire - 2105.
What's with engineers and accuracy? I don't know, but I guess that makes me one with the mentality too.artmichalek said:Having the engineer mentality myself, I'd do the roll test a bunch of times and average the results.
artmichalek said:Having the engineer mentality myself, I'd do the roll test a bunch of times and average the results.
skydive69 said:I concur. I finally decided to do the tire measurement manually, and using the method described in the Polar manual (measure the circumference and then subtract 4 mm), my measurement came out to exactly their recommended setting for a 700x25 tire - 2105.
cheapie said:help! i put my polar 720 on my mountain bike and the book lists mtb tires up to 26X1.95. i have 26X2.1. is there a formula i can use to figure the metric circumference?
cheapie said:help! i put my polar 720 on my mountain bike and the book lists mtb tires up to 26X1.95. i have 26X2.1. is there a formula i can use to figure the metric circumference?
gruppo said:Measure the circumference of the tire and enter it manually.
So true - it's just that the engineer/pilot mentality that I am stuck with cries out for accuracy and precision.[/QUOTE]skydive69 said:I usually use the manufacturer's default setting for tire size. Doing rollout involves probably more human error than the minute differences in tire size between manufacturers. I've checked my mileage on rides against another rider with the same size tires but weighing 30 lbs more than me and the difference was .2 mile over about 25 mfiles. One of us could have zigged or zagged that much, so I wouldn't get too worked up over the alleged precision of manually entered rollouts.
Gonzo Bob said:Being really lazy myself, I simply measure the actual with of the tire and estimate the circumference with
circ ~= (bead dia. + 2*width)*3.1416
Subtract 2mm for better accuracy
circ for 700x25 ~= (622 + 2*25)*3.1416 - 2 = 2109mm
mitosis said:Problem with this method is you don't take into account the smaller diameter caused by your weight on the tyre. Sit on the bike and measure. There is no error to allow for with this method.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.