In article <
[email protected]>, Kurgan Gringioni
<
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"scott patton" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>> In article <
[email protected]>, Nick Burns <
[email protected]> wrote:
>> >Considering that SF is only about 50 square miles, nobody does group
>rides
>> >*in* San Francisco. The riding opportunities are superb. The only
>advantage
>> >in Colorado is the altitude.
>>
>>
>> And lack of humidity. A humid day in CO is dryer than a dry day in San
>Fran.
>>
>> If the "Bay Area" is so great, I gotta wonder why there are so many people coming here.
>
>
>
>Jobs. There is a tech bust in the Bay Area. Cost of living. Because of the unwillingness of the
>people to develop the open space that remains, there has been a shortage of developable land for
>many years now.
There aint **** for jobs in Colorado, I promise.
>If I had a choice between Denver and SF, I'd take SF. It's got something rare in the Western US -
>it's really a city (city center, mass transit, different boroughs, each with their own character).
>Denver is nice, but it is threatening to become a gigantic piece of suburban sprawl, albeit next to
>the Rockies.
Good call. I avoid denver like the plague.
>BTW, for 16 years I lived 100 miles from Denver, so I'm quite familiar with the area. Never have
>lived in SF, so I am not homering it.
I only have limited time in SF, same with denver. I do like the Springs, Durango seems pretty nice
too... just a little too remote for me.
Scott
--
-*- Scott Patton -*- Colorado Springs, CO -*-
http://www.FixedGearFever.com -*- Track Racing
Web Services