A mate claims to do it mainly to look the part.Courtancer said:I can't believe the excuses males come up with to shave their legs. The wind resistance is going to make absolutely no difference at all unless you're an olympic sprinter. The excuse about gravel rash is a bit weak. I've heard people say that it is easier to avoid infection of you crash. Considering you would have to shave a couple of times a week, are you planning to fall off your bike every day? If you clean it properly there's not much chance of infection. Its better for a massage... Possibly but is a once a month massage worth the month of shaving?
I would just like to hear the real reasons why men shave their legs. e.g. Does it feel good, look good, etc. I know the various reasons why women shave their legs and I prefer shaved to hairy.
Well... I think hairy girls are sexy! Kidding.Becky_Aus said:Definitely not hairy. I wax (lasts far longer than shaving) not to enhance my cycling performance but because I'm a girl, and to not do so would be gross
I can see where you're coming from on the whole "shaving doesn't benefit you." I swam for five years (competitively, in High School and beyond) before I stopped. I shaved my legs/body atleast once in each of those years, and after a season of being hairy? It seemed to be benefit me when there was none of that "resistance".3speeder said:Hmmm. Is there really much of a point to it? I've been swimming for a while now (though only rarely competitively), and most swimmers only shave for competitions, whereas cyclists seem to be shaven all of the time. I can't see why, because it's a pain to do, and air is alot less viscous than water, so it seems you'd really not know the difference anyway.
That being said I only shave every once in a long while (last time was well over a month ago) so generally, yeah usually hairy.
Becky_Aus said:Definitely not hairy. I wax (lasts far longer than shaving) not to enhance my cycling performance but because I'm a girl, and to not do so would be gross
OUCH! I'm planning to trim (not to shave) my leg hairs.GERARDO said:Wax Guys, Wax.....it's Far Better.
I see that your screenname is xyclone...another way to say cyclone i assume...do you go to Iowa State University(cyclones)?Xyclone said:OUCH! I'm planning to trim (not to shave) my leg hairs.
PartisanRanger said:Sorry, but shaving your legs is for women only. I'm guessing cyclists do it for the look more than anything else. It seems rather gay to me...
Because caring how your legs look isn't a straight thing to do.GERARDO said:Excusme, Where does it says it's only for women?, It's a rule or some thing?, sorry, I'm not in that club. I'm sincere, I do it for the looks.....I like my legs a lot.
It seems rather gay to me making opinions about others being "gay". Why "gay" it's the first thing you think?....
PartisanRanger said:Because caring how your legs look isn't a straight thing to do.
I established the rule, it's gay because I said so. Happy?GERARDO said:AGAIN: Who stablished that rule?, Where does it says that?, Is there a book where I can find that, who act gay and who act straight??.....Did you notice that a lot of straight man act so gay (in your words) nowadays and that doesn't mean they are?.
AND AGAIN: I found quite interesting that the first thing in your mind is the word "gay", Why not "vain" instead?....
Anyway, none of these words are an offense to me.
PartisanRanger said:I established the rule, it's gay because I said so. Happy?
I am the Grand Executor of Earth and Destroyer of Worlds.GERARDO said:Interesting......And who are you?....I'm always happy by the way, thanks.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.